Search Results for "Patta Inclusion"

21 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. The court held that the appellants failed to prove adverse possession and the suit for partition was within limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case pertains to a second appeal filed by the defendants against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and the first appellate court in a suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Direction for Patta Mutation Based on Purchase and Explanation Representation. Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation and Pass Final Orders Within Twelve Weeks Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, claiming title through purchase, approached the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Mutation of Revenue Records Without Notice. Petitioner Seeks to Quash Entry of Sixth Respondent’s Name in Town Survey Register, Alleging Violation of Natural Justice and Title Dispute Based on Will.

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the entry of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus to Direct Cancellation of Patta. Petitioner Claims Absolute Ownership and Alleges Wrongful Inclusion of Private Respondents' Names in Revenue Records.

The petitioner, S. James, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Petitioner's Representation for Inclusion of Name in Patta in Ancestral Property Case. Court Orders Consideration of Representation Within Eight Weeks Without Expressing Opinion on Merits.

The petitioner, V. Pushpavalli, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against Review of Concurrent Findings in Forest Land Dispute Under Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967. High Court Exceeded Review Jurisdiction by Re-appreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Concurrent Findings of Fact.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Telangana against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, which had revi...