Search Results for "Parallel CIRP"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Parallel CIRP"

22 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Corporate Guarantee. The court set aside the injunction as the guarantee deed was unconditional and the bank had a prima facie case under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, enabling it to proceed under SARFAESI Act and IBC.

17 Feb 2026

The appeal arose from an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (Commercial Court) in I.A. No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act, Holding That Section 14 Orders Are Administrative and Not Subject to Appeal Under Section 18. The court clarified that the remedy against a Section 14 order lies only by way of writ petition under Article 226/227, and the DRT has no power to review or recall its own Section 14 order.

12 Dec 2025

The Bombay High Court dealt with a batch of writ petitions and interim applications challenging orders passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) unde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.

3 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Group of Companies Doctrine to Larger Bench in Arbitration Dispute Over Software Agreement. Questions validity of applying the doctrine to bind non-signatory parent company to arbitration under Sections 8, 11, 35, and 45 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Cox & Kings Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reclassification of Mill Land as Non-NAINA Area Under DCPR 2034. Court upholds Monitoring Committee's decision that land not required for textile industry reverts to municipal reservation for public housing and amenity purposes.

22 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Glider Buildcon Realtors Pvt Ltd and Mafatlal Industries Ltd challenging the decision of the Monitor...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes SARFAESI Proceedings Against Company Under CIRP — Resolution Professional Entitled to Possession of Assets. Held that Section 14 of IBC overrides SARFAESI Act and other laws, and the moratorium under IBC bars any proceedings against the corporate debtor's assets.

24 May 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Dreams Infra India Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Resolution Professional Sri Ashok Kriplani appointed by the National Company Law...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Resolution Professional in IBC Moratorium Dispute. Section 14(1)(d) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prohibits owner from recovering property occupied by corporate debtor during moratorium, even under joint development agreement.

19 Feb 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the interpretation of Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The appellant, Ra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Limitation Bar — Winding Up Petition Filed Beyond Three Years from Default Date Cannot Be Revived Under IBC. The Court held that a time-barred winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be treated as a valid Section 7 application under the IBC, and the filing of a suit for specific performance does not extend limitation for a winding up petition.

25 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from the admission of a winding up petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The pet...

Tribunals

NCLAT Hears Appeal Against NCLT Order in Byju's Insolvency Case — NCLT Set Aside CoC Reconstitution and Reclassification of Creditor. Appeal Filed by Suspended Director and Promoter Under Section 61 of IBC Challenges Validity of NCLT Directions.

30 Nov -0001

The appeal was filed by Byju Raveendran, the suspended director and promoter of M/s Think and Learn Pvt. Ltd., under Section 61 of the Insolvency and ...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Liquidator's Appeal Seeking Return of Bank Guarantees and Margin Money Post-Invocation. Bank Guarantee Invocation Extinguishes Both Margin Money and Bank's Liability, Liquidator Cannot Claim Refund.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal by Mr. Rajendra Prasad Tak, the Liquidator of M/s. KVK Nilachal Power Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor), against an order of th...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)