Search Results for "Ossification test"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Ossification test"

142 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Rape of Minor Daughter Under POCSO Act and IPC. The Court upheld the conviction under section 376(2)(f) IPC and sections 6 and 9(n) read with section 10 of POCSO Act, 2012, finding the victim's testimony credible and age proven through school records, rejecting claims of false implication and insufficient evidence.

9 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Special Court for Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, Greater Bombay, in POCSO Case No. 485 of ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 363 and 366 IPC for Kidnapping and Abduction Due to Failure to Prove Victim's Minority. Evidence that Victim was Below 18 Years Was Not Reliably Established as School Records Lacked Support of Original Entry Maker and Ossification Test Had Margin of Error.

15 Nov 2017

The case arose from a criminal appeal filed by Ashok s/o Ramlakshtra Tiwari against his conviction by the 11th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC; Considers Whether Prosecutrix's Testimony and Medical Evidence Support Conviction. Prosecution's case hinged on testimony of prosecutrix who allegedly eloped voluntarily, raising questions on the legality of conviction under Section 366 IPC when the girl was on the verge of attaining majority.

28 Feb 2011

The present criminal appeal arose from the judgment of the Extra Joint Sessions Judge, Latur in Sessions Case No. 132 of 1998, wherein the appellant w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Consensual Relationship. Victim's Age Not Proved Below 18, and Sexual Intercourse Was Consensual, Leading to Acquittal Under Sections 363, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act.

8 Sep 2022

The appellant, Yadav Chandoba Dawlekar, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.19 of 2015 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Workers Challenging Superannuation Based on Medical Board Age Determination. Medical Report Prevails Over Unverified Seniority List Entries for Illiterate Workers Under Industrial Disputes Act.

1 Feb 2017

The petitioners, Vithabai w/o Govind Pawale and Hussainabi Diwankhan, were daily wage workers employed by the Forest Department. They joined duties on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Victim's Age. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child under POCSO Act.

27 Mar 2018

The appellant, Prashant Korwate, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 376(1) IPC read with Section 3 punishable ...

High Court

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.466 OF 2016

7 Jun 2019

The appeal was filed before the Bombay High Court against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, convicting the appellant under Sect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping Case Due to Prosecutrix Being a Willing Companion Above 16 Years. Consent and Age of Prosecutrix Established Through Evidence, Leading to Acquittal Under Section 363 IPC.

16 Feb 2015

The appellant, Bharat Bageshwar, was convicted by the Sessions Court for kidnapping a minor girl under Section 363 IPC and sentenced to one year rigor...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age of Victim. Birth Certificate with overwriting and lack of ossification test render age of victim unproven, vitiating conviction under Sections 376(2)(i),(n) IPC, Goa Children's Act, and POCSO Act.

5 Nov 2020

The appellant, Santosh Gore, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa in Special Case No.36/2017 for offences under Section 376(2)(i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child below 18 years.

5 Jul 2022

The appellant, Mahesh S/o Kundlik Dhavare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad in Special (POCSO) Case No.26 of 2015 for offences under Sect...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)