Search Results for "Order XXXVII"

165 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Allowing Production of Original Documents in Summary Suit. Order XXXVII Rule 7 CPC permits application of general CPC provisions for filing originals of photocopies already on record.

The respondent/plaintiff filed a summary suit for recovery of money under Order XXXVII CPC. Along with the plaint, he filed 22 documents, of which 7 w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Summary Suit for Recovery of Money — Defendant Granted Leave to Defend as Triable Issues Exist. The court set aside the decree and remanded the matter for trial, holding that the trial court erred in not granting leave to defend under Order 37 Rule 3(6)(a) CPC.

This appeal by the defendant is directed against the judgment and decree dated January 25, 2010 in O.S. No. 15450/2005 passed by the XXVI Addl. City C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan Amounts Based on Bills of Exchange. Disputed Questions of Fact Regarding Repayment and Interest Rates Require Trial Under Order XXXVII CPC.

The judgment concerns two Commercial Summary Suits filed by a mother (Kavita G. Rajani) and her son (Gautam G. Rajani) against a common defendant, Sam...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Commercial Summary Suit Cases — Triable Issues Raised on Guarantee and Limitation. Court holds that existence of disputed facts regarding limitation and discharge of guarantor requires unconditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by the defendants against the dismissal of their applications for leave to defend in commercial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit — Emphasizes Need for Brevity in Pleadings. The court allowed the defendants to defend the suit on condition of depositing a portion of the claimed amount, while deprecating prolix pleadings.

The applicant, JSW Steel Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against M/s. Paras Das Jain and Sons and two ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit Based on Dishonoured Cheques — Defendant Must Deposit Full Suit Amount. Court holds that under Order XXXVII CPC, leave to defend can be granted on condition of deposit when defence is not bona fide or raises no triable issue.

The petitioner, Navnath R. Adak, was the defendant in Summary Suit No. 464 of 2015 filed by the respondent, Rakesh Giridharilal Rungta, under Order XX...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit — Defendant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC Requires Strict Compliance with Conditions for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

The appellant, Purnendu Shekharmal Jain, was the original defendant in Summary Suit No. 2539 of 2012 filed by M/s ACG Associated Capsules P Ltd. An ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Decree in Summary Suit Due to Lack of Proper Service of Summons. Delay of 164 Days Condoned as Defendant Demonstrated Good Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order XXXVII of CPC, 1908.

The plaintiff, Fountainhead Promotions & Events Pvt Ltd, filed a Summary Suit No. 874 of 2010 against the defendant, Gitanjali Lifestyle Limited, clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Summary Suit Due to Defective Summons — Form 4 Instead of Form 4-A Under Order XXXVII CPC Renders Service Invalid. The court held that the summons must strictly comply with the prescribed form and failure to do so vitiates the service and the consequent decree.

The appellant, Ramesh Shende, was the defendant in a summary suit filed by the respondent, Narayan Wakodikar, under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil ...