Search Results for "Order XXXII"

81 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Money Laundering Case Under PML Act. Petitioner, a first-time offender with no criminal antecedents, granted bail subject to stringent conditions including bond, surrender of passport, and weekly reporting to ED.

The petitioner, Shri S.C. Jayachandra, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Award in Partition Suit for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners, who were entitled to 1/4th share each in joint family property, were not allotted any share in compromise decree passed without their consent.

The petitioners, Vajravathi and Roopa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the award dated 13.04...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Advocate for Disrupting Court Proceedings. Advocate's Rowdy Behavior and Improper Language in Court Amounts to Prima Facie Criminal Contempt Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The High Court of Bombay, on its own motion, initiated contempt proceedings against Mr. N.B. Deshmukh, an advocate, based on an incident that occurred...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Compromise Decrees Passed Without Appointment of Representatives Under U.P. Court of Wards Act. Section 56 of the U.P. Court of Wards Act, 1912, Held to be Directory and Not Mandatory, Validating the Compromise Decrees.

The dispute arose from two cross-suits between the appellant, proprietor of Ganeshpur Estate, and the respondent, proprietor of Ramnagar Estate, conce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim exclusive possession of joint family property without partition and that a suit for possession without seeking partition is not maintainable.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a civil suit for possession filed by the original plaintiffs (now appellants) against the defendants...