Search Results for "Order XXIII CPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Order XXIII CPC"

148 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 148 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee Upon Withdrawal of Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Court Fee Deposited at Time of Filing. The court held that the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC mandates refund of court fee when a suit is withdrawn unconditionally, and the trial court's rejection of the refund application was erroneous.

19 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Bindu Balakrishna Patali, filed a suit (Com. O.S. 150/2024) before the LXXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of 9-Year Delay in Recall Application in Suit Withdrawal Case — Unconditional Withdrawal Under Order XXIII Rule 1(1) CPC is Plaintiff's Absolute Right. The court held that the plaintiff's right to unconditionally withdraw a suit is absolute and cannot be fettered by the court, and a delay of over 9 years in seeking recall of such an order cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.

21 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Vaishnavi Engineers and Developers Private Limited, had filed a suit (RCS No. 782 of 2012) against the respondents seeking declar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Consent Terms Recording Satisfaction of Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable. Execution of Arbitral Award Governed by Arbitration Act, Not Commercial Courts Act; Appeals Confined to Section 37 of Arbitration Act.

14 Dec 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed three commercial appeals filed by Usha Kakade, Sanjay Kakade, and Kakade Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against an ord...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Compromise Decree Validity — Oral Statements Not Sufficient to Transfer Ownership Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Sale Deed Executed During Pendency of Appeal Remains Valid and Not Affected by Subsequent Dismissal of Suit.

15 Jul 2024

The case involves a property dispute arising from two rounds of litigation. In the first round, Mansha Ram and others (plaintiffs) filed a suit for de...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Not Applicable When Suit Not Barred by Law. The pendency of a probate proceeding does not bar a suit for partition and the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

8 Jan 2020

The appellant, Sri Venkatalingaiah Murthy, filed a petition for Letters of Administration (P&SC No.63/2011) in respect of the Will of late Sri K. Moha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Reference on Interpretation of Section 9A CPC (Maharashtra Amendment) — Jurisdiction Includes Limitation. The court examines whether the expression 'jurisdiction of the Court to entertain such suit' under Section 9A includes the issue of limitation, doubting the correctness of Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society v. Praveen D. Desai.

4 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered a reference made by a Division Bench doubting the correctness of the decision in Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society Li...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Order Holding Partition Suit Maintainable Despite Earlier Compromise Decree. Court Rules That a Compromise Decree Does Not Bar a Fresh Suit for Partition When the Decree Was Not Acted Upon and the Parties Continued in Joint Possession.

21 Jun 2019

The petitioner, defendant No.1 in O.S.No.114/2017, filed a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Transposition of Defendants as Plaintiffs in Suit for Cancellation of Sale Deed — Subsequent Purchasers Pendente Lite Allowed to Continue Suit Despite Withdrawal by Original Plaintiffs. The Court Held That Defendants Who Were Originally Plaintiffs and Had Identity of Interest Could Be Transposed Under Order XXIII Rule 1-A CPC to Protect Their Rights and Avoid Bar of Limitation.

6 Mar 2019

The case involves a civil suit originally filed in 1989 by A.C. Nataraja Mudaliar against A.V. Manoharan (defendant No.1) and R. Dhanasundari @ R. Raj...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compromise Decree in Civil Suit Due to Fraud and Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC — Suit Restored for Hearing on Merits. The court held that a compromise decree obtained without a written and signed compromise and without the court recording satisfaction about its lawfulness is illegal and liable to be set aside under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Kasturevva, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Dharwa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Disputed Consent Terms. Consent Decree Set Aside as Court Failed to Verify Genuineness of Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

20 Sep 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 28 September 2012, which made absolute a motion for recordi...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)