Search Results for "Order VII Rule 11 CPC"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit for Specific Performance. Court holds that plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC when it discloses a cause of action and raises triable issues regarding fraud and misrepresentation.

The petitioners, defendants in a suit for specific performance, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Striking of Election Petition Paragraphs in Municipal Election Dispute. Court upholds that vague allegations of corrupt practices without specific details of consent by the returned candidate are liable to be struck off under Order VI Rule 16 CPC.

The petitioner, Eknath Bayaji Gadkari, filed an election petition under Section 33(1) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenging the e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Partition Suit for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action and Bar by Limitation. Daughter-in-law's suit for partition of ancestral property dismissed as she is not a coparcener and claim is time-barred under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC.

The plaintiff, Smt. Jayashree Ashok Goregaonkar, filed a suit for partition against the defendants, including Kanta Chandrakant Mhatre and others. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Suit — Upholds Order Rejecting Plaint for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action. Failure to Establish Title and Possession Leads to Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The appellant, M/s. Rizvi Builders, a proprietary concern of Mr. Akhtar Hasan Rizvi, filed a suit against the respondents, who are members of a Hindu ...