Search Results for "Order 18 Rule 17"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Order 18 Rule 17"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Civil Court Order in Trust Dispute — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejection of Application to Reopen Evidence Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC. The court held that the Civil Court's discretionary order rejecting the application to recall witnesses after the case was reserved for judgment did not warrant interference under Article 227.

25 Jun 2025

The petitioners, who are defendants in a civil suit pending before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Mandya, filed writ petitions under Article 227 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Revision and Writ Petition in Property Dispute. Trial Court's Refusal to Allow Recall of Witness and Amendment of Plaint Upheld as No Jurisdictional Error or Material Irregularity Found.

19 Dec 2022

The judgment arises from a property dispute between the Plaintiffs (Jitendra Velji Faria and another) and the Defendants, including the Municipal Corp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Recall Witness and File Additional Documents in Eviction Suit. Order under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC is discretionary and cannot be used to fill gaps in evidence after closure of plaintiff's evidence.

24 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Pandharinath L. Bhandari, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 12 July 2018 passed by the Small Causes Court at Bandra, M...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Reopening of Evidence in Partition Suit Subject to Costs and Conditions. The court set aside the trial court's rejection of applications for reopening and leading further evidence, directing expeditious disposal.

9 Aug 2018

The case involves a partition suit filed in 2008 by the respondent/plaintiff against her siblings and other family members concerning properties left ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order in Partition Suit — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejection of Application to Reopen Evidence Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC. The court held that the trial court's discretion to reject the application for reopening evidence was judiciously exercised and did not warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution.

23 Feb 2018

The petitioners, who are defendants in a partition suit (O.S. No. 56/2006) pending before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC at Chickballapur, filed a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Application to Recall Witness in Specific Performance Suit — Trial Court's Dismissal of Recall Application Set Aside. Recall of PW-1 for Cross-Examination by Defendants 4 to 7 Permitted Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC as No Prejudice Caused to Plaintiff.

29 Jun 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Shewalkar Developers Ltd., was the original plaintiff in a suit for specific performance of contract filed before the learned Civ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence in Partition Suit. Court holds that Order 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to fill gaps in evidence or to re-examine witnesses on matters already covered, and that the trial court's discretion in refusing to reopen evidence was not perverse or arbitrary.

19 Nov 2015

The petitioners, who are plaintiffs in a partition suit (O.S. No. 100/2007) pending before the Principal Civil Judge, Bangalore Rural District, filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Application to Reopen Evidence in Civil Suit. Trial Court's Discretion Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Upheld as Defendants Had Sufficient Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witness.

25 Aug 2011

The petitioners, who were the original defendants in Special Civil Suit No.74/2010 pending before the Second Joint Civil Judge, Satara, filed four wri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Trust Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence. Applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for recall of witness under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, as the application was filed after a long delay and lacked bona fides.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Sau. Sumita Pradeepkumar Dixit (original defendant No. 4) against the Gangadhar Makharia Chari...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)