Search Results for "Order 15-A CPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Order 15-A CPC"

38 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 38 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Legal Heir of Ascetic in Babulnath Temple Trust Property Dispute — Permissive Occupation Does Not Confer Tenancy Rights. The Court held that the petitioner, as legal representative of the original defendant, was bound by the decree for possession and could not claim tenancy rights based on permissive occupation of temple property.

6 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Dharamgiri Maharaj (since deceased, represented by legal heir Jagannath Giri), was the legal representative of the original defendant,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Return of Plaint in Summary Suit, Holds Dispute Not Commercial Under Commercial Courts Act. Assignment of Debt by Leasing Company Not an Ordinary Transaction of Financier or Trader Under Section 2(1)(c)(i) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

11 Nov 2024

The case involves an Interim Application filed by Defendant No. 1 (Varanium Cloud Limited) seeking return of the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 of the...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Subsequent Events Must Be Permitted to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings. The Court held that the Trial Court's partial rejection of amendment was arbitrary and not judicious, and set aside the impugned order under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

12 Oct 2023

The Petitioner, Mr. Suvarn Rajaram Bandekar, filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the Respondent, Mr. Armando Cardozo (since ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Petition in Rent Control Case — Tenant's Acquisition of Alternate Premises Not Proven and Landlord's Bona Fide Requirement Not Established. The court upheld the concurrent findings of the trial court and appellate court that the landlord failed to prove grounds for eviction under Sections 13(1)(l) and 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

21 Dec 2018

The petitioners, Ranjanwadi Shikshan Trust and others, as landlords, filed a civil suit (Civil Suit No. 18 of 1979) seeking eviction of the respondent...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition in Civil Procedure Code Case — Order on I.A. Nos.62 and 64 Quashed for Non-Compliance with Order VIII Rule 1A CPC. Court held that documents not produced along with plaint or written statement cannot be received as evidence without leave of court and without showing sufficient cause.

22 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Vinayaka House Building Co-operative Society, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Res Judicata and Limitation in Will Execution Dispute. Prior US Surrogate Court decree and delay in filing render suit not maintainable under Section 11 CPC and Limitation Act, 1963.

23 Feb 2015

The suit was filed by Jaswinder Paul Batra, Brinder Batra, and Sunaina Batra (plaintiffs) against Neeru Batra, Baljit Singh, ING Vysya Bank Ltd., and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement Despite Trial Commencement — Liberal Approach Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. Amendment Sought to Incorporate Alternative Plea of Ownership Based on Adverse Possession Not Barred by Delay or Lack of Due Diligence.

22 Oct 2013

The petitioners, who were defendants in Regular Civil Suit No. 242/2007, filed an application (Exh. 42) for amendment of their written statement. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

25 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment in Specific Performance Suit. Amendment to incorporate subsequent events and additional reliefs was held permissible under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as it did not change the nature of the suit.

6 Jan 2012

The petitioner, original defendant No.5 in a suit for specific performance of agreements dated 19/4/1992 and 20/11/1992 concerning lands bearing Surve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Refusing to Strike Out Defence in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held That Denial of Title by Tenant Without Supporting Evidence Does Not Attract Striking Out of Defence Under Order 15A CPC.

22 Aug 2005

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the defendants (M/s. Keshavdas Hassanand and others) against an order of the Trial Court re...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)