Search Results for "Order 1 Rule 10"

23 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Impleadment of Government Officers Permitted. Pre-Trial Amendment Liberally Allowed to Avoid Multiplicity of Litigation Under Order 1 Rule 10 and Order 6 Rule 17 CPC.

The present petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners, who are the original plaintiffs in Special Civil Sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Petitions Challenging Orders on Impleading and Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Held That Trial Court's Discretionary Orders Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Are Not Interfered With Under Article 227.

The case involves two Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, arising from a suit for specific performanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Impleadment of Proposed Defendants in Suit Under MOFA. Court holds that impleadment of persons claiming title to the property is necessary for effective adjudication of the suit under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Mahendra Jayantilal Vora and two others (petitioners) challenging an order of the trial court allowing thei...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Impleadment of Purchasers in Specific Performance Appeal — Purchasers Claiming Through Plaintiff Are Not Necessary Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Protects Their Interests Without Impleadment.

The petitioner, Smt. Sonabai Sahebrao Pathrud, filed a suit for perpetual injunction against respondent no.1, Bhausaheb Ganpati Gaikwad, on 14 Februar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiaries in Trust Petition — Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applies. Court holds that persons claiming beneficial interest under a trust are necessary and proper parties to a trust petition under Section 41A of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the petitioner, Harishchandra Amarnath Puri, in a Trust Petition (No. 1 of 2017) pending before the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses KSFC's Petition to Implead in Specific Performance Suit. Mortgagee is not a necessary party to a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale.

The Karnataka State Financial Corporation (KSFC) filed writ petitions challenging the order of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mangalore, dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Plaint to Include Relief Against Transferee Pendente Lite in Property Dispute. Transfer of Property Act Section 52 Applies to Bind Transferee Pendente Lite by Decree.

The petitioners filed Regular Civil Suit No.742 of 1996 seeking declaration and permanent mandatory injunction against the respondents regarding suit ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Impleadment of Co-owners in Suit for Possession. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Allows Addition of Parties with Direct Interest in Subject Matter to Avoid Multiplicity of Suits.

The petitioners, Sitaram Deorao Pawar and Totaram Deorao Pawar, filed two separate writ petitions challenging an order dated 6/11/2003 passed by the J...