Search Results for "Non-Arbitrariness"

28 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tenancy Provisions in Maharashtra Tenancy Act. Maximum Rent and Purchase Price Fixation Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21.

The petitioners, a trust and its trustees, challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 11 and 15 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 19(2) of Bombay Parole and Furlough Rules, 1959 as Unconstitutional — Mandatory One-Year Gap Between Parole Releases Violates Article 14 and 21. Rule 19(2) held arbitrary and irrational for imposing blanket bar without considering individual circumstances.

The petitioner, Kantilal Nandlal Jaiswal, a life convict undergoing sentence for murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC, along with other ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Tender Condition Preferring State-Registered Tank Trucks in LPG Transportation Contracts. Transporters Challenged Preference Given to State-Registered Tank Trucks as Arbitrary and Violative of Section 46 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioners, transporters from Gujarat, challenged a condition in the e-tender floated by Indian Oil Corporation Limited for Bulk LPG transportati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Whether Minister Can Drop Land Acquisition After Award and Dismissal of Landowner’s Challenge. Matter Concerns Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Power of Acquiring Authority to Object.

The petitioner, City & Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO), acting as the New Town's Development Authority under the Maharashtra Regional & Tow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Notification Exempting Light Motor Vehicles and MSRTC Buses from Toll on Sion-Panvel Highway. Dispute Arises from Concession Agreement Where Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Exemptions Cause Substantial Daily Revenue Loss and Contradicts Terms of Agreement.

The dispute arose from a concession agreement for widening and maintaining an arterial highway from Mumbai to Panvel, awarded to M/s Sion Panvel Tollw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Contract and Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Coal Transport Tender Dispute. Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind by Western Coalfields Limited Leads to Setting Aside of Order Cancelling Letter of Allotment and Debarment.

The petitioners, including a joint venture firm and its constituents, challenged an order dated 19.2.2014 passed by the respondents, Western Coalfield...