Search Results for "Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881"

1093 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1093 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Whether Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Can Give Evidence by Affidavit. Court Considers Application for Quashing of Proceeding Permitting Accused's Affidavit and Rejection of Section 311 Cr.P.C. Application.

The petitioner, as complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, sought quashing of the proceeding...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications by Partners of Unregistered Firm in Cheque Dishonour Case. Term 'Firm' in Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Includes Unregistered Firm, Allowing Prosecution of Partners for Vicarious Liability.

The case involved two criminal revision applications filed by Satheesan Kuttappan and Satyaseelan Kuttappan against P.P. Sudhakaran and the State of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Postal Authorities in Kisan Vikas Patra Fraud Case. Postal authorities not vicariously liable for agent's fraud as payment was made to holder under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and appellants' negligence in signing instruments contributed to loss.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by Pradeep Kumar and Raj Rani against postal authorities, including the Post Master General and othe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 378(4) CrPC in Section 138 NI Act Case - Appeal Against Acquittal in Private Complaint Lies Under Section 378(4) CrPC, Not Proviso to Section 372 CrPC

The case involved a reference to a larger bench to resolve a conflict regarding the maintainability of an appeal against acquittal in a prosecution un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings in NI Act Case Due to Absence of Legally Recoverable Debt Allegation. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails to aver existence of legally enforceable debt or liability.

The petitioner, R Parimala Bai, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of proceedings in CC No.22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Loan Amount. Plaintiff entitled to decree for Rs.1.65 Crores with interest as defendant failed to raise a triable issue under Order XXXVII CPC.

The plaintiff, Tradelink Exim (India) Pvt Ltd, filed a Commercial Suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Criminal Complaints Under Section 138 NI Act Not Covered by Company Law Moratorium. The expression 'suit or other proceedings' in Sections 442 and 446(1) of Companies Act, 1956 does not include criminal proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a reference to resolve a conflict between two Single Judge judgments of the Bombay High Court regarding whether criminal complaints ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Lack of Specific Allegations of Role in Day-to-Day Affairs. Directors Cannot Be Vicariously Liable Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averments of Their Involvement in Company's Business.

The petitioners, including a company and its directors, challenged the order issuing process under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable...