Search Results for "NSEIL Bye-laws"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "NSEIL Bye-laws"

26 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Rejection of Section 34 Petition. Court Holds That No Interference Is Warranted Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 When the Arbitrator's Findings Are Based on Evidence and Not Perverse.

14 Mar 2016

The appellant, Mrs. Money Nair, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment dated 13 March 2015...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice in NSEIL Dispute. Arbitrator Failed to Offer Hearing Despite Claim Exceeding Rs.25,000, Breaching Rule 5.10 of NSEIL Trading Regulations.

17 Apr 2013

The petitioner, Milaan C. Jhaveri, challenged an arbitral award dated 20 April 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of the Arbitration an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Share Broker Dispute for Ignoring Material Evidence and NSE Bye-laws. The court held that the arbitrator's failure to consider the petitioner's evidence and the bye-laws rendered the award perverse and liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Mar 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a share broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 13 November 2009 passed by a sole arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Non-Consideration of Counter Claim in NSEIL Dispute. Failure to consider counter claim amounts to legal misconduct and violation of natural justice under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

18 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Rajendra A. Shah (H.U.F.), a constituent, challenged an arbitral award dated 17th February 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitrator's findings that the respondent was entitled to recover the amount due from the petitioner for squared-off positions, rejecting the petitioner's counterclaim.

17 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Kritika Nagpal, appointed the respondent, Geojit Financial Services Ltd., to effect transactions on the Futures & Options Segment of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Due to Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the arbitral tribunal erroneously shifted the burden of proof and failed to follow principles of natural justice, rendering the award liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

31 Aug 2012

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award passed by a tribunal constituted un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Perverse.

2 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Sunil Keshav Rane, challenged an arbitral award dated 28 April 2009 passed by an arbitrator under the Byelaws, Rules and Regulations o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice — Additional Claims Filed After Proceedings Closed Without Notice to Opposite Party. The court held that the award passed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was liable to be set aside as the petitioner was not given an opportunity to respond to additional claims submitted after the proceedings were closed.

18 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Ramesh K. Patel, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ex-parte arbitral awa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Violation of NSEIL Rules Renders Award Contrary to Public Policy. Trading Member's Squaring Off of Defaulting Client's Position Upheld as Permissible Under Bye-Laws, Award of Damages for Loss of Higher Price Set Aside.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Ventura Securities Limited, a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSEIL), challenged an arbitral award d...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)