Search Results for "Mysore Village Panchayats Act"

59 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 59 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order in Gram Sabha Resolution Dispute — Procedural Irregularities in Gram Sabha Proceedings Render Resolution Invalid.

The Petitioner, Gajanan Baburao Sankpal, was the Chairman of the Pani Purvatha Ani Swachhata Samiti (Water Supply and Sanitation Committee) constitute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners Challenge Notifications and Awards Under Bangalore Development Authority Act Asserting Lapse Under Section 24 of 2013 Act.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed between 2013 and 2015 by multiple landowners against the State of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Postponement of Local Body Elections Due to COVID-19. Court Upholds State Election Commission's Discretion to Postpone Elections Under Article 243U of Constitution and Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, Finding No Arbitrariness in Decision.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging the decision ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Conflicting Precedents on Procedural Mandates for No Confidence Motions Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Reference to Larger Bench Examines Whether Formal Motion and Seconding Requirement Under Rule 17 of Meeting Rules is Mandatory or Directory.

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from a no confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Theur, Pune. The appellant, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Grampanchayat Dispute. Special Meeting Convened by Tahsildar Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Valid Despite Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petitioner, Surekha Eshwar Jadhav, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Bhatapur (PD), Taluka Mukhed, District Nanded. Respondent nos.1 to 6, who wer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Three Writ Petitions Challenging Government Orders and Lokayukta Charge Memoes in Basava Vasati Housing Scheme Scam Case. Court Examines Legality of Disciplinary Proceedings Under Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957 and Lokayukta Act, 1984.

Three writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka by retired engineers of Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL),...