Search Results for "Mutual Funds"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Mutual Funds"

164 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Divorce Decrees by Mutual Consent Under Parsi Marriage Act. Presiding Judge of Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court Can Pass Decree Without Delegates' Assistance Under Section 32B of Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936.

10 Mar 2005

The petitioners, trustees of the Parsi Panchayat Funds and Properties, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the learned Presiding Judge of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Dividend Distribution Tax Rate. DDT under Section 115-O is a tax on the company, not on shareholders, and the India-UK DTAA does not provide a lower rate for DDT.

27 Apr 2026

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of seven appeals filed by Foseco India Ltd. under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Against Mutual Fund Under Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act — Holds That Beneficiaries of Securitization Trust Are Not Liable for Trust's Tax Demand. Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not impose joint and several liability on beneficiaries of a securitization trust for the trust's tax dues when the trust is assessed as a separate entity and the beneficiary holds only pass-through certificates.

6 Mar 2013

The petitioner, UTI Mutual Fund, is a registered mutual fund under SEBI regulations. It invested in a securitization trust called Indian Corporate Loa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Family Court Order Directing Husband to Pay Full Ad Valorem Court Fees on Claim for Recovery of Amount in Matrimonial Dispute. Court Fees Act, 1959 - Section 8 - Inquiry into Court Fees - Held that when a party claims a specific sum of money, court fees must be paid on that amount, and the court can treat an application as an inquiry under Section 8.

6 Apr 2018

The petitioner-husband, Shri Vijay Jagdish Chheda, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Family Court No. 2, Pune...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows SEBI's Appeal Against Securities Appellate Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Penalties for Fraudulent Diversion of Funds. The Court Held That Immediate Diversion of Preferential Allotment Proceeds from Disclosed Objects Constitutes Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Under SEBI PFUTP Regulations, 2003, and Ratification Cannot Cure Such Violations.

17 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from Securities and Exchange Board of India's (SEBI) action against Terrascope Ventures Limited (formerly Moryo Industries Limited) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Stay Order in Income Tax Dispute — Directs Fresh Consideration of Stay Application on Merits. Revenue directed to pass a reasoned order on the stay application after hearing the assessee, considering the strong prima facie case and financial hardship.

4 Apr 2013

The petitioner, HDFC Bank Limited, challenged an order dated 18 March 2013 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax - 2(3), Mumbai, which di...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Doctrine of Mutuality for Incorporated Clubs — Supply of Food and Drinks to Members Not Taxable as Sale. The Court held that Article 366(29-A)(e) does not override the mutuality principle and that incorporated clubs acting as agents of their members do not effect a 'sale' under sales tax laws.

3 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court in this batch of appeals considered the applicability of the doctrine of mutuality to incorporated clubs after the 46th Amendment to...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compounding Application in SEBI Act Case, Overturning Lower Court Decisions on Consent Requirement. Court Holds That Section 24A of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Does Not Mandate SEBI's Consent for Compounding, and Compounding Can Be Considered at Advanced Trial Stages Based on Factual Assessment.

23 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a criminal prosecution under Section 24(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the appellant, a di...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against SEBI Order Declaring Art Funds as Collective Investment Schemes. Trusts managing pooled investments in art works held to be Collective Investment Schemes under SEBI Act, 1992, despite being structured as trusts rather than companies.

12 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 19936 of 2017 challenging the order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal which had upheld SEBI's directio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds De-freezing of Bank Accounts with Bank Guarantee Condition in Cheating Case. Court holds that Section 102 CrPC freezing cannot be indefinite and must be balanced against right to carry on business, directing furnishing of bank guarantee for de-freezing.

7 May 2026

The case involves two applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The first application (APL No.191 of 2024) is filed by t...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)