Search Results for "Minerals Concession Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "Minerals Concession Rules"

88 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize Enhancement During Subsistence of Lease.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Haryana against judgments of the Punjab and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Seizure and Fine in Minor Mineral Transport Case — Tractor Carrying Murum for Filling Potholes Not Illegal Mining. Use of Tractor for Personal Purpose Without Royalty Receipt Does Not Attract Penalty Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

14 Dec 2022

The petitioners, Prakash Tumdu Chaudhari and Sujit Prakash Gujrati, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Government Order Cancelling Mining Leases for Non-Existent Quarrying Leases — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Application of Mind. The impugned order cancelled quarrying leases under Section 4(1A) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Rule 8(1) of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994, but petitioners held only mining leases, not quarrying leases.

24 May 2021

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Ganapathy Granite Impex Pvt Ltd. and Sri Janardhan Naik challenging an order dated 20.06.2018 p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2016 — Time Limit for Obtaining Environmental Clearance Upheld. Rule 8-B requiring quarry lease holders to obtain environmental clearance within 24 months from commencement of amendment rules is held to be reasonable and not violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution.

12 Mar 2021

The petitioners, holders of quarry leases for minor minerals, challenged the validity of Rule 8-B of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against Rejection of Prospecting Licence Application Under Section 10-A of Mines and Minerals Act. Application Filed Before Amendment Not Rendered Ineligible as It Was Pending When Amendment Came Into Force.

8 Feb 2021

The petitioner, M/s J K Cement (Western) Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Transport of Already Mined Iron Ore in Goa Mining Case — Interprets Earlier Ban as Limited to Mining Operations Only. Court holds that direction to stop mining from 16.3.2018 did not prohibit transportation of minerals already extracted before that date, and State Government is entitled to permit such transport subject to payment of royalty and other dues.

30 Jan 2020

The case arises from a series of litigations concerning iron ore mining in Goa. The Government of India appointed Justice M.B. Shah as a Commission of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Order Removing Lands from Mining Lease in Mineral Auction Dispute. Transfer of Mining Lease Valid Under Rule 22(6) of MCR 1960, State Cannot Unilaterally Excise Lease Area for Auction Without Following Due Process.

19 Nov 2019

The petitioner, M/s. J.K. Cement Limited, held a mining lease (ML No. 2344A) over certain lands in Metagudda Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Condition Levying Royalty on Excavation of Earth for Reservoir Construction — Excavation of ordinary earth for construction of earthen dyke within leased land does not constitute 'mining' under MMDR Act, 1957.

4 Nov 2019

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, is an integrated steel plant that was allotted 629.92 acres of land by the Karnataka Industrial Area Developme...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Illegal Sand Mining Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 22 of Mines and Minerals Act. Proceedings under Section 379 IPC and other allied offences held not maintainable without prior sanction under Section 22 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

15 Nov 2017

The petitioners, a lorry driver and lorry owner, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of proce...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Release of Seized Minerals in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Failed to Establish Ownership and Transport Permits Were Invalid

19 Sep 2014

The petitioner, a partner in Srinivasa Minerals Trading Company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)