Search Results for "Metro rail"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Metro rail"

194 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 194 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal by Chennai Metro Rail Ltd. in Land Acquisition Dispute — Government Land Transfer Upheld Over Private Ownership Claims. Grama Natham Land Classified as Government Property Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, Not Subject to Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jun 2026

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by the Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) and its officers against an order of a single judge dated 02.04...

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notice for Chennai Metro Station. Petitioner's challenge centered on whether CMRL's show cause notice under Section 3(2) of Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 was vitiated by post-decisional hearing after CMRL undertook before court in an earlier PIL to acquire the land.

11 Mar 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by United India Insurance Company Limited, challenging a show cause notice ...

High Court

Madras High Court Addressed Appeal and Writ Petition by Elevator Company Challenging Procurement Eligibility Clause in JICA Loan Agreement — Controversy Centered on Constitutionality of Nationality Restriction Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India and Section 27 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

11 Mar 2025

The matter arose from writ petitions and writ appeals filed by OTIS Elevator Company (India) Limited before the Madras High Court. The appellant chall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Contract by MMRDA. Contractual Dispute with Arbitration Clause Not Amenable to Judicial Review Under Article 226 as Termination Was in Accordance with Contract Terms.

25 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Systra MVA Consulting (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company with 70% stake in Systra-SMCIPL Consortium, was appointed as General Consultant by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Arbitral Award Set Aside by Commercial Court. Court Restores Arbitral Award Holding That the Commercial Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence.

29 Aug 2024

The case involves a commercial dispute between Navayuga Engineering Company (appellant) and Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited along with other ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.

31 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Concessionaire in Airport Metro Express Line Dispute. The court held that the Delhi High Court's interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was unjustified, as the Arbitral Tribunal's findings on defects and material breach in the concession agreement were based on evidence and within its jurisdiction.

9 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals arising from a dispute between Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (DAMEPL), the appellant and co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tree Authority Resolution for Metro Tree Felling Due to Lack of Quorum and Non-Compliance with Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act, 1975. The resolution approving felling of 2646 trees was invalid as the Tree Authority meeting lacked quorum and illegally delegated powers to the Tree Officer.

4 Oct 2019

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions challenging a resolution dated 29th August 2019 passed by the Tree Authority, Mumbai, which appro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses BEML Limited's Challenge to Disqualification in Nagpur Metro Tender. Court upholds tender evaluation committee's decision to disqualify BEML for not meeting eligibility criteria under the tender conditions.

25 Oct 2016

The petitioner, BEML Limited, a Central Public Sector Undertaking, challenged the decision of respondent no.1, Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited (...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)