Search Results for "Mardia Chemicals"

66 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 66 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of DRAT Orders on Pre-Deposit Waiver and Status Quo in Secured Asset Auction. Legal Question Concerns Applicability of Section 18 Pre-Deposit Requirement to Appeals Dismissing Condonation of Delay and Challenging Sale Certificate.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by an auction purchaser (Aloukik Construwell LLP) and a secured creditor (HDFC Bank Limited) challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Possession Dispute — Possession Notice Valid but Sale Notice Invalid. Bank Permitted to Proceed from Stage of Rule 8(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

The petitioners, M/s. Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. (borrower) and Mrs. Ganga Devi Gupta (guarantor and mortgagor), challenged an order of the Debts Recovery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Trial Court's Jurisdiction Ruling in SARFAESI Act Suit. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Permanent Injunction Against Re-auction of Mortgaged Property Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions.

The respondent, original plaintiff, filed Regular Civil Suit No.1756 of 2014 seeking a permanent injunction restraining the applicant bank from re-auc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Revision Application by Bank in SARFAESI Act Jurisdiction Dispute — Civil Court Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Allegations of Fraud Must Be Specific and Supported by Material to Bypass Statutory Remedy Before Debt Recovery Tribunal.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Punjab National Bank (original defendant) against an order of the District Judge, Chandrapur, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Involving Nominal Sale Deed and Bank's Securitization Proceedings. Civil Court's jurisdiction barred under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 for challenging bank's attachment notice under Section 13(2).

The appellants, Smt. Savita Bhagwantrao Patil and Chaitanya Bhagwantrao Patil, were the original plaintiffs in a suit filed before the 6th Joint Civil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Assignee Bank Can Invoke SARFAESI Act for Debt Assigned by NBFC. The case involves interpretation of 'debt' and 'secured creditor' under SARFAESI Act, 2002 and RDDBFI Act, 1993, and the effect of assignment from a non-banking financial company to a bank.

The petitioner, a banking company, sought to enforce security interest under the SARFAESI Act after acquiring a debt and underlying security from a no...