Search Results for "Mamlatdars' Courts Act 1906"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to MRT Order on Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings. Earlier Dismissal for Default Does Not Bar Subsequent Proceedings Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948.

The petitioner, Ashish Chandrasingh Jhaveri, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 2nd November, 2018 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Mamlatdar's Order in Passage Obstruction Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Denied Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses and Adduce Evidence Under Section 5 of Mamlatdars Courts Act, 1906.

The petitioner, Sudhir Yashwant Dhangade, challenged the orders dated 16/06/2017 and 02/01/2018 passed by the learned Tehsildar (Mamlatdar), Chiplun a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Right of Way Under Section 143 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Petitioner's Brother Already Granted Way Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906

The petitioner, Vijay Jagannath Pophale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Agreement to Sell Despite Non-Payment of Balance Consideration. Court Holds That Time Was Not of Essence in Absence of Express Stipulation and That Possession Delivered Under Agreement Constitutes Part Performance.

The dispute arose out of an agreement to sell dated 1st June 1978 executed by the original defendant No.2 (since deceased, represented by appellants) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition Challenging Remand Order by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in Tenancy Dispute. Finality Clause under Section 73 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Does Not Bar Revision Jurisdiction of Tribunal When Possession Issue Remains Unresolved.

The petitioners, landlords, were aggrieved by an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 31 July 1991 in Revision Application No. MRT.P....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellants' Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits Dismissed as Plaintiffs Did Not Discharge Burden of Proof Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between the legal representatives of Balaji Ramaiya Manthanwar (appellants) and G...