Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act"

730 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 730 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Restores Removal of Up-Sarpanch and Panchayat Member for Illegal Attempt to Transfer Sarpanch's Statutory Powers | Section 39 Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act

25 Feb 2026

The petitioner, elected Sarpanch of Hiware Village Panchayat, sought removal of Respondent Nos. 5 (Up-Sarpanch) and 6 (Member) under Section 39(1) of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Factory in Lump-Sum Contribution Dispute. Agreement for lump-sum contribution in lieu of taxes under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Rules, 1961 held binding on village panchayat, barring unilateral revision of tax.

26 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Ltd., a public limited company located within the territorial jurisdiction of Village Panchayat Jogeshwari, challenged a ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 applies only to candidates for election, not to sitting members, and the no-confidence motion was validly passed.

1 Dec 2023

The Petitioner, Vitthal Rajaram Shitole, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Koregaonmul. He filed a writ petition challenging a no-confidence motion p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Sarpanch Challenging Removal Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. Minister Failed to Consider Petitioner's Submissions, Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 39(3) of the Act.

7 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Vilas Bhagwat Jagtap, was elected as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Mudegaon in October 2017. Due to political rivalry, respondent no. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Panchayat Election Schedule During COVID-19 Pandemic — State Election Commission's Power to Conduct Elections Under Article 243K and Goa Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 Upheld. The court held that the election schedule was not arbitrary and that the Commission had taken adequate safety measures, dismissing petitions challenging the schedule.

11 Dec 2020

The petitioners, who were candidates or intending candidates for the Goa Panchayat elections, challenged the election schedule notified by the Goa Sta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — No Evidence of Wilful Omission Causing Loss to Gram Panchayat. Disqualification set aside as Collector failed to record finding of loss and appellate authority dismissed appeal without considering merits.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Savita Devidas Adhane, was elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Viramgaon. On 04.08.2018, the District Collector, Aurangabad, disqualifi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

9 Oct 2014

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Gram Panchayat Encroachment Dispute — Limitation Under Section 53(2A) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act Not Mandatory. The court held that the Gram Panchayat has jurisdiction to remove encroachments even after six months from the date of notice, and the appellant failed to prove title or possessory title.

8 Aug 2014

The appellant, Gajanan Gyanuji Zamre, filed a suit for injunction against the Gram Panchayat, Kodali Zamre, seeking to restrain the Panchayat from rem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Meeting Rules Apply to No Confidence Motion Meetings Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958; No Fresh Meeting Can Be Convened After Expiry of Seven Days on Basis of Illegal Motion. The court ruled that Rule 17 of the Meeting Rules applies to no confidence meetings and that under Section 35(3-B), no direction can be given for a fresh meeting after seven days on an illegal motion.

21 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court addressed two questions of law referred to it concerning the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The first question was whether...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Secretary's Order Restricting Construction on Triangular Property for Traffic Safety Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act. The Court held that the Secretary's order under Section 178(2) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, prohibiting construction on a triangular plot to ensure road safety and visibility, was valid and not arbitrary.

20 Jul 2010

The case involves two writ petitions challenging an order dated 24/03/2003 passed by the Secretary to the Government of Goa (Panchayats) under Section...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)