Search Results for "Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act"

207 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Tenancy Rights in Third Round of Litigation. Respondent's Adoption by Widow Before Tillers Day Confers Tenancy Rights Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The case involves a long-standing dispute over tenancy rights in two agricultural lands (Survey No.37/4 and 38/6) in Village Kharshi, Satara District....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows State and Claimant Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 30 per sq.m. with 30% Deduction for Development. Court applies belting method and deducts development cost for large land parcel acquired for Nhava-Sheva water supply.

The case involves two appeals arising from the same award dated 30th September 1989 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Raigad at Alibag in La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Dispute Over Land Ownership and Tenancy Rights in Survey No. 73/1 at Mouje Rohinjan. Petitioner-Trust's Claim of Exemption Under Section 88-B of BT & AL Act Contested by Tenant's Rights and Historical Orders; MRT Decision Under Scrutiny.

This case involves a dispute over the land bearing Survey No. 73/1 at Mouje Rohinjan, with the petitioner claiming the land is part of their trust and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Mutation entries are summary in nature and do not confer title; disputes regarding title must be resolved by a civil court.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging mutation entries made in the revenue reco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent findings of fact by trial and appellate courts cannot be interfered with under Article 227 unless perverse or without jurisdiction.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original defendant Shankar Mahada Kardile, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...