Search Results for "Maharashtra Prison Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Prison Rules"

263 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 263 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs States to Ensure Free Legal Aid to Prison Inmates Under Article 21 and 39-A of the Constitution — Access to Justice for Indigent Prisoners is a Fundamental Right. The Court held that free legal assistance is a fundamental right even if not requested, and Magistrates must inform accused of this right.

4 Oct 2024

The present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed by Suhas Chakma seeking directions to the Union of India, States, and Union T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Convicts Despite Past Overstay, Emphasizes Reformative Purpose of Furlough. Furlough is a right of a prisoner and cannot be denied solely on ground of past overstay without considering subsequent good conduct and period of incarceration.

26 Nov 2019

The judgment pertains to two criminal writ petitions filed by convicts Satish Shankarrao Shinde and Nagnath Bapurao Sontakke, challenging the rejectio...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Long Incarceration. Accused Not Named in FIR and No Direct Evidence of Involvement Under Section 302 IPC.

26 Jul 2019

The petitioners, accused Nos. 1 and 2, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Crime No. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Cutting of Remission for Late Return from Parole but Orders Refund of Illegal Deposit. Parolee's two-day delay in reporting back to prison justified cutting remission by two days, but the condition requiring deposit of Rs.15,000 for grant of parole is illegal and must be refunded.

30 Jan 2019

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed by life convicts challenging the cutting of remission for late return from parole and seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Parole for 30 Days to Perform Religious Duties and Maintain Family Ties — Parole Granted Under Maharashtra Prison (Parole and Furlough) Rules, 1959 Despite Conviction for Murder and Cruelty to Wife. The court held that parole is a privilege intended to help convicts maintain social and family ties, and should be liberally considered, and directed release subject to conditions.

20 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Javed Bashir Bagwan, a life convict convicted under Sections 302 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code by the Sessions Court at Ahmednagar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reduces Prison Punishment for Overstaying Furlough — Cutting of Remission Modified to One Day for Each Day of Overstay. Principle of Proportionality Applied to Prison Discipline Under Prisons Act, 1894 and Prisons (Bombay Furlough) Rules, 1959.

24 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Buwaji Sahadeo Hazare, a prisoner, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the prison punishment impos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Convicts Police Head Constable for Criminal Contempt for Misconduct in Executing Conviction Warrants. Wilful Disobedience of Court Orders and Misuse of Official Seal Constitute Contempt of Court Under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

5 Aug 2014

The present contempt proceedings arise out of a reference dated 18/20th April 2013 made by the District Judge-3, Ambajogai to the Bombay High Court. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Life Convict in Furlough Rejection Case — Nature of Offence Not a Valid Ground for Denial Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. Furlough is a right, not a privilege, and cannot be denied solely because the prisoner was convicted under Section 366 IPC.

4 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Subhash Hiralal Bhosale, was convicted under Sections 376(2), 366, 342, 506(II) read with 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and sentence...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Petition Alleging Double Jeopardy in Prison Punishment and Transfer. Transfer of prisoner to Special Prison does not require prior court approval and forfeiture of remission for misconduct is not double jeopardy.

20 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Niyaj Ahamad Abdul Jabbar, a convict lodged in Open Prison, Morshi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court (Nagpu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough for Prisoners Despite Past Overstay on Parole — Overstay Not a Permanent Bar Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough) Rules, 1959. The Court held that furlough is a right of a prisoner and past overstay on parole cannot be a permanent bar for grant of furlough.

28 Jun 2006

The judgment concerns three criminal writ petitions filed by prisoners whose applications for furlough leave were rejected by the prison authorities o...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)