Search Results for "Maharashtra Entertainment Duty Act"

134 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 134 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court at Bombay Partly Allows Cinema Owner's Petition Against Entertainment Tax Demand and Penalty — Exemption Does Not Absolve Liability for Tax Collected from Customers, But Penalty Set Aside as Excessive.

The petitioner, Minakshi Chitra Mandir, a cinema hall in Sailu, District Parbhani, was granted exemption from payment of entertainment tax under the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Order in Cable Operator Entertainment Duty Case — Compounding Provision Misused as Adjudication Mechanism. Section 9A of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 cannot be invoked for determining duty and penalty without a proper adjudication under Section 7.

The petitioner, Vimal Balbhim Nangane, was a cable operator in Mumbai Suburban District. The Collector issued a notice on 15 January 2004 alleging tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Entertainment Duty on Permit Rooms and Beer Bars with Live Orchestra. Levy of Rs. 50,000 or Rs. 25,000 per month is a valid fiscal measure not infringing Article 19(1)(g) and does not constitute double taxation.

The petitioner, Ashok Ganapati Gupta, proprietor of M/s. Ashoka Restaurant and Bar, filed a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of t...