Search Results for "MVAT set off"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "MVAT set off"

35 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Pre-deposit Condition for Appeal Under MVAT Act — Petitioner's Appeal to Be Heard Without Further Pre-deposit as Amount Already Deposited Exceeds 10% of Disputed Tax. The court held that the appellate authority has discretion to waive or reduce the pre-deposit under Section 26(6) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, and the condition was unreasonable given the substantial amount already deposited.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioner, VVF (India) Limited, a public limited company engaged in the manufacture and sale of oleo-chemicals and personal care products, filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Builders' Challenge to Circulars Restricting Composition Scheme for Works Contracts Under MVAT Act. Circulars Clarifying That Benefit of Composition Scheme Under Section 42(3A) of MVAT Act, 2002 Applies Only to Agreements Registered on or After 1 April 2010 Are Valid and Within Commissioner's Power.

30 Oct 2012

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by the Builders Association of India and the Maharashtra Chamber ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Stay on Interest Demand in MVAT Case — Tribunal Erred in Treating Composite Order as Non-Appealable Under Section 30(2). The court held that an appellate order confirming interest under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, when part of a composite assessment order, is appealable and stay can be granted.

6 Jun 2023

The petitioner, S. K. Trading Co., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 Septemb...

High Court

High Court of Bombay hears writ petition challenging constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 on input tax credit set-off — Petitioner seeks reading down of 'actually paid' to 'ought to have been paid'

11 May 2012

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a partnership firm registered as a dealer under the Maharashtra Value Ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Mutual Fund Against Sales Tax Reassessment Orders — Holds Mutual Fund Not a Dealer Under MVAT Act, 2002. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond Limitation Period and Without Proper Sanction Are Invalid.

6 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Axis Mutual Fund, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging several orders passed by the sales ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank of Baroda's Petition to Quash Sales Tax Attachment Over Secured Assets, Holding SARFAESI Act Priority Over State Dues. Secured Creditor's Claim Under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides Crown Debt Under MVAT Act, Attachment Without Notice Invalid.

11 Sep 2025

The Bank of Baroda, a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act, had sanctioned credit facilities to M/s. Gajanan India Chemco between September 2009 an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition Against GST Attachment of Secured Assets Under SARFAESI Act. Priority of Secured Creditor Over Crown Debts Upheld Under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act and Section 31B of RDDB Act.

21 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Indian Overseas Bank, a secured creditor, had extended credit facilities to Respondent No. 3, Savair Energy Limited. Upon default, the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Orders Against Former Directors in GST Case — Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed Without Shedding Corporate Veil. Directors Who Resigned Prior to Tax Period Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Dues Under MGST Act, BST Act, and CST Act Without Lifting Corporate Veil.

22 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Mukesh D. Ramani, Satish D. Sanghavi, and Prakash D. Sanghavi, were former directors of Twin City Organics Pvt. Ltd. They filed writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Publication of Name on Website of Beneficiary Dealers in Hawala Transactions Case. Input Tax Credit Claim Based on Bogus Invoices from Fictitious Vendors Justifies Revenue's Action Under MVAT Act.

25 Mar 2013

The petitioner, M/s Timex Art Décor Pvt. Limited, a registered dealer in plywood and decorative laminates, filed Modvat returns for 2008-09 and 2009-...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Rigid Frame Columns Are Steel Structurals Classifiable Under Section 14(iv)(v) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Schedule Entry C-55(v) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Court examines the classification of pre-fabricated building components and the interpretation of 'steel structurals' in commercial parlance.

23 Dec 2016

...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)