Search Results for "MMC Act 1888"

164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging OBC Reservation in Municipal Corporation Elections. Court upholds validity of reservation based on triple test conditions and delimitation process.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Raju S/o Sripad Pednekar and Sameer Kamlaakar Desai challenging the reservation of seats for Other B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Municipal Corporation's Power to Regulate Hoardings on Railway Property. Petitions seek declaration that Railway Properties exempt from local authority jurisdiction under Railways Act, 1989.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India (Western Railway) and numerous private advertising entities. The pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Eviction Order Under MMC Act — Agreement for Sale Does Not Confer Corporation Premises Status. Premises Not Owned or Vested in MCGM, Hence Eviction Proceedings Under Chapter VA of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Not Maintainable.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the legal representatives of late Laxman Keshav Kudalkar against an eviction order passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Extensions in Commercial Premises. Petitioners Failed to Show Any Sanctioned Plan or Permission for Structures on Compulsory Open Space Under Section 55 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, occupants and owners of shops in Dattani Shopping Centre, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 14 January 2011 passed by the Assistant M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Immovable Property for Warehousing and Storage. Levy of Service Tax Under Section 65(105)(zzzz) of Finance Act, 1994 on Renting of Immovable Property for Commercial Use is Valid and Constitutional.

The petitioners, including Tulsidas Khimji Warehousing Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed writ petitions challenging the levy of service tax on renting of im...