Search Results for "MMC Act"

177 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 177 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Immovable Property for Warehousing and Storage. Levy of Service Tax Under Section 65(105)(zzzz) of Finance Act, 1994 on Renting of Immovable Property for Commercial Use is Valid and Constitutional.

The petitioners, including Tulsidas Khimji Warehousing Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed writ petitions challenging the levy of service tax on renting of im...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Extensions in Commercial Premises. Petitioners Failed to Show Any Sanctioned Plan or Permission for Structures on Compulsory Open Space Under Section 55 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, occupants and owners of shops in Dattani Shopping Centre, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 14 January 2011 passed by the Assistant M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Eviction Order Under MMC Act — Agreement for Sale Does Not Confer Corporation Premises Status. Premises Not Owned or Vested in MCGM, Hence Eviction Proceedings Under Chapter VA of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Not Maintainable.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the legal representatives of late Laxman Keshav Kudalkar against an eviction order passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Holding Suit Maintainable Despite MRTP Act Bar. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Section 149 of MRTP Act Where Dispute Involves Title and Possession, Not Just Planning Violations.

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dated 22/3/2013 passed by ...