Search Results for "MHADA Act Section 95-A"

23 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Court upholds MHADA's order directing petitioners to vacate and hand over possession of chawl rooms for redevelopment under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The petitioners, who are residents of Mohamed Tajbhai Chawl in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Court Receiver to Evict Third Party from Suit Property in Port Trust Lease Dispute. Third party found in illegal occupation of building without any right, directed to be evicted with police assistance.

The Bombay High Court addressed a Court Receiver's Report seeking directions regarding a third party, Mr. Sahebrao Kadam, who was found occupying subs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MCGM's Condition of 100% Tenant Consent for Redevelopment of Dilapidated Buildings. Clause 1.15 of C-1 Guidelines Requiring Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements with All Tenants as Precondition for Commencement Certificate is Valid and Enforceable.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the condition imposed by the Municipal Corpo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner’s Sanction for Sale of Trust Property. Court’s Determination Not Included in the Provided Judgment Fragment.

The matter arose from an application filed by the trustees of a registered public trust before the Charity Commissioner seeking prior sanction for sal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Suit Challenging MHADA Notice. The court held that the petitioner, a company, was not a necessary or proper party to the suit between tenants and MHADA and had no right to be impleaded.

The petitioner, Orbit Corporate Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 9-2-2012 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Consents Verified and Video Recorded. Tenants Who Refused to Vacate Were Issued Notices Under Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976; Court Found No Merit in Grievance.

The ten petitioners, occupants of a cessed structure on CS 1101, Khandia Street, Byculla, Mumbai, challenged a redevelopment scheme sanctioned by MHAD...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes NOC Cancellation Order in MHADA Housing Dispute — Procedural Violation of Natural Justice. Board's Order Cancelling No Objection Certificate Set Aside as Passed Without Hearing Affected Parties, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, Bharat Kanakia and Rajendra Shah, along with others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 16...