Search Results for "Lokayukta Inquiry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Lokayukta Inquiry"

142 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging KSAT Order in Service Matter — Petitioner's Application Under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Restored. Court Holds That Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Application for Default Without Considering Merits and That Petitioner Was Denied Opportunity of Hearing.

6 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Sri T.S. Shivaramu, an Assistant Director of Treasury in the Office of the Commissioner of Treasuries, Bengaluru, filed a writ petitio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Government Order Declining Enquiry Entrustment to Lokayukta in Corruption Case. Section 14(3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Mandates Entrustment of Enquiry Once Complaint is Made Against Public Servant.

25 Jan 2022

The petitioner, the Registrar of Karnataka Lokayukta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Government Or...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Entrustment in Departmental Enquiry — Lack of Consultation with Vigilance Commission. Entrustment of enquiry to Lokayukta without prior consultation with Karnataka State Vigilance Commission under Section 9(3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 is invalid and unsustainable.

11 Dec 2020

The petitioners, employees of the Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Corporation, challenged the order dated 29.10.2018 of the Managing Direct...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Disciplinary Entrustment Orders Passed Against BBMP Employees After Acquittal in Bribery Cases. Court Finds Government Failed to Apply Mind Under Section 12(4) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and There Was Inordinate Delay in Initiating Proceedings.

12 Nov 2020

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru adjudicated two writ petitions filed by BBMP employees, K.S. Nanjegowda and N.G. Nataraj, who challenged gove...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Delivers Common Order in Writ Petitions on Disciplinary Enquiry Against Assistant Public Prosecutors. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution Challenging KSAT Orders Which Upheld Lokayukta's Enquiry Under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957.

14 May 2020

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed by Assistant Public Prosecutors-cum-Assistant Government Pleaders under Articles 226 and 227 of the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lokayukta's Rejection of Complaint Against MLAs for Alleged Offence Under Section 17(2) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 — Complaint Not Maintainable as Members of Legislative Assembly Are Not 'Public Servants' Under the Act.

5 Mar 2018

The petitioners, Adarsh R. Iyer and Prakash Babu B.K., co-presidents of Janaadhikaara Sangharsha Parishath (JSP), filed writ petitions under Articles ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Commercial Tax Officers in Corruption Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of PC Act Renders Prosecution Invalid. FIR under Sections 13(1)(d), (i)(ii)(iii), 13(1)(e) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 quashed as prior sanction from competent authority was not obtained, violating mandatory requirement under Section 19(1) of PC Act.

23 Mar 2017

The petitioners, four public servants employed as Commercial Tax Officers and staff, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Crimin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Upa-Lokayukta Recommendation in Disciplinary Matter — Procedural Fairness Required When Disagreeing with Inquiry Officer. Upa-lokayukta cannot disagree with inquiry officer's findings without providing opportunity of hearing; disciplinary authority must follow natural justice before differing from inquiry officer or Upa-lokayukta.

24 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Sri Shankarappa, an employee of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL), challenged the recommendation dated 16.01.20...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Petition Against Tribunal Order in Service Matter — Senior Motor Vehicle Inspectors Entitled to Higher Pay Scale. Principle of Equal Pay for Equal Work Applied to Employees Performing Same Duties Under Same Employer.

11 Jul 2016

The State of Karnataka and the Commissioner for Transport filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Report in Mining Lease Dispute — Report Under Section 12(3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. The Lokayukta's recommendation to cancel mining lease and initiate criminal proceedings was quashed as the petitioner was not heard before the report was made.

13 Jul 2015

The petitioner, M/s Kumaraswamy Mineral Exports Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a report d...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)