Search Results for "Kotak Mahindra Bank"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Kotak Mahindra Bank"

139 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Banks to Comply with RBI Prudential Framework for Stressed Assets Resolution in Writ Petition by Borrower Company. Court holds that the Prudential Framework dated June 7, 2019, requires lenders to convene a review meeting within 30 days of default to decide on a resolution plan.

25 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Ganjam Nagappa and Son Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles 226...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Banks to Comply with RBI Prudential Framework for Stressed Assets Resolution in Writ Petition by Borrower Company. The court held that the RBI circular dated June 7, 2019, is binding on banks and that the borrower has a right to seek a review meeting under the framework.

25 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Ganjam Nagappa and Son Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles 226...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Issues Writ of Mandamus to Direct Registration Authorities to Implement Bombay High Court's Order Declaring Insolvent's Transactions Void. Registration Authorities Under Registration Act, 1908 Bound to Give Effect to Binding Judicial Orders Under Article 226(2) of Constitution of India, Despite Territorial Differences, as Inaction Amounts to Wilful Disobedience.

27 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a secured creditor of Electrex (India) Limited, against the State of Karn...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Due to Compromise — Petitioner Allowed to Withdraw Amount Deposited. Settlement Reached for Rs.33 Lakhs in Installments, Court Permits Withdrawal of Rs.6 Lakhs Already Deposited.

20 Sep 2021

The petitioner, Ms. Shally M. Peter, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash the order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Orders Release of Impounded Vehicle in Motor Vehicles Act Case — Detention Unwarranted as Documents Were Available. Vehicle owner entitled to release of vehicle impounded under Section 207(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for non-production of documents, as owner was ready to pay fine and documents were subsequently produced.

16 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Vijay Kashinath Goradkar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking release of his Toyota Fortuner vehicle (...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Recall of Annulment Order in Insolvency Case Due to Concealment of Creditor. Appellant Insolvent Failed to Disclose Kotak Mahindra Bank as Creditor with DRT Recovery Certificate, Leading to Recall of Annulment Under Section 22(1) of Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

31 Mar 2021

The case involves an appeal filed by Akshay D. Thakkar (the Appellant/Insolvent) against an order dated 18th September, 2018 passed by a learned Singl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Closes Contempt Petitions Against Alchemist for Non-Payment of Rs. 4.5 Crores to Kotak Mahindra Bank, Directs Payment Subject to High Court Determination. The Court held that the order dated 07.05.2012 was binding until modified, and Alchemist's failure to pay constituted disobedience, but since the amount was deposited, no contempt action was taken.

23 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court of India disposed of contempt petitions filed by Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited (KMBL) against Alchemist Assets Reconstruction Company ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging RBI's Directions to Cooperative Bank — RBI's Directions Under Section 35A of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Natural Justice. The Court Held That Section 35A Does Not Require a Prior Hearing and the Directions Were Issued in Public Interest to Protect Depositors.

6 Oct 2018

The petitioners, The Veershaiva Cooperative Bank Ltd. and its employees' union, filed a writ petition challenging the directions issued by the Reserve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition by Deutsche Bank Against Finolex Industries Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 — Disputed Derivative Transaction Debt Precludes Summary Winding-Up. Court Holds That Winding-Up Petition Is Not a Debt Recovery Mechanism and Dismisses Petition with Costs.

28 Mar 2014

The judgment arises from a Company Petition filed by Deutsche Bank AG, Mumbai Branch, seeking winding-up of Finolex Industries Limited under Section 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Kotak Mahindra Bank Seeking Priority Over Secured Creditors in Liquidation Proceeds of Hukumchand Mills Ltd. The Court held that the Official Liquidator's decision to distribute sale proceeds among secured creditors in accordance with Section 529A of the Companies Act, 1956 was correct and that the petitioner, as an unsecured creditor, was not entitled to priority.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Official Liquidator of Hukumchand Mills Ltd. to dis...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)