Search Results for "Karnataka Victim Compensation Scheme 2011"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 498A and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Bhimappa S/o Mallappa Bingi, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 498A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Interstate Child Trafficking Case Due to Perverse High Court Orders and Absconding Accused. Bail Granted Without Considering Gravity of Offences Under Sections 363, 311, 370(5) IPC and Organized Nature of Racket.

The Supreme Court dealt with a series of appeals filed by victims' families seeking cancellation of bail granted by the Allahabad High Court to 13 acc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Legal Representatives to Continue Appeal Under Section 166(5) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166(5) Held Retrospective, Applies to Pending Appeals Where Claimant Died Before Amendment.

The case involves two appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 07.03.2011 in MVC Nos.19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted to Accused in Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case. The Court Held That the High Court Erred in Granting Bail by Overlooking the Gravity of the Offence and the Victim's Right to Be Heard Under Section 2(wa) Cr.P.C.

The Supreme Court set aside the bail granted by the Allahabad High Court to Ashish Mishra @ Monu, the main accused in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence cas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Deceased was a 60-year-old agriculturist earning Rs.6,000 per month; Tribunal's notional income of Rs.4,500 per month enhanced to Rs.6,000 per month with multiplier of 9 and 1/3rd deduction for personal expenses.

The appeal was filed by the claimants (wife and children of the deceased Buddappa) under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 378(4) CrPC in Section 138 NI Act Case - Appeal Against Acquittal in Private Complaint Lies Under Section 378(4) CrPC, Not Proviso to Section 372 CrPC

The case involved a reference to a larger bench to resolve a conflict regarding the maintainability of an appeal against acquittal in a prosecution un...