Search Results for "Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2016"

34 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Mining Offences Under MMDR Act and IPC. Prosecution Under MMDR Act Requires Complaint by Authorized Officer; Police FIR Without Authority is Illegal.

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad dealt with a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Twelve Criminal Petitions Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Seeking Quashing of Mining Offence Proceedings. Petitions Sought to Quash Proceedings Under Sections 379, 511 IPC and Various Provisions of MMRD Act and KMMC Rules, Raising Common Question of Law.

Twelve criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Disposes of Criminal Petitions Seeking Quashing of Proceedings Under Mines and Minerals Act. The Petitions Challenged Registration of Cases Under IPC and MMRD Act, 1957, Claiming Lack of Authorized Complaint Under Section 22.

The High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench, presided by Justice H.P. Sandesh, heard a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in MMDR Act Cases Due to Lack of Authorisation. Police Registration of FIR for Mining Offences Without Competent Authority's Complaint Held Invalid Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

A batch of criminal petitions was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.

The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...