Search Results for "Karnataka Excise Rules"

128 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 128 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Rebate Claim Case Due to Limitation Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act. Rebate of duty on exports is governed by the limitation period prescribed under Section 11B, as 'refund' includes 'rebate' under Explanation (A) to that section.

The appellant, Sansera Engineering Limited, a manufacturer of excisable goods, exported goods between August 2015 and October 2015 and filed claims fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana. Rule 24(i-eeee) of Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914 as State Government Cannot Delegate Power to Determine Number of Licenses for Entire State.

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 (as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana — Rule 24(i-eeee) Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914. State Government's Exclusive Power Under Section 58(2)(e) to Regulate Licenses in Local Areas Cannot Be Delegated to Financial Commissioner.

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970, as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Excise Appeal, Upholds Transfer Fee Demand for CL-7 Licence Renewal Under Rule 17B of Karnataka Excise (General Conditions of Licences) Rules, 1967. Induction of Legal Heir of Deceased Partner Constitutes Transfer of Licence Requiring Payment of Transfer Fee.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Commissioner of Excise and Deputy Commissioner of Excise against an order of a learned Single Judge of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Cancellation of CL-2 Liquor License for Violation of Distance Norms Under Karnataka Excise Act, 1965. License Granted in Contravention of Rule 8(2) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 Set Aside.

The case involves two writ appeals arising from a common order dated 07.09.2022 passed by a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.50353/2019. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Excise License Renewal for Bars and Restaurants Despite Minor Irregularities in Application Process. License Renewal Cannot Be Denied for Technical Defects When Licensee Has Substantially Complied with Conditions and Paid Fees.

The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka and its excise authorities against orders of a learned Single Judge directing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Classification of Plant Growth Promoters as Excisable Goods Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Products Containing NPK as Essential Constituent Classified as 'Other Fertilizers' Under Note 6 Chapter 3105, Attracting 1% Duty.

The petitioners, Dharti Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged an order dated 8 March 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise...