Search Results for "Karnataka Court Fees Act"

581 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 581 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Excise License Renewal Case — State Cannot Deny Renewal Without Proper Notice and Hearing. Renewal of FL-3 license under Maharashtra Foreign Liquor Rules cannot be refused on grounds of pending criminal proceedings without affording opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, John Distilleries Private Limited (formerly John Distilleries Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, with its ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Demand Against University for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Grant Personal Hearing Renders Order Illegal Under Section 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017. Circulars Mandating Personal Hearing Before Adverse Order Are Binding on Adjudicating Authority.

The University of Mumbai, established under the Bombay University Act, 1953 and later governed by the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016, filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds SC/ST Reservation in Excise Licenses — CL-7D Rules Valid. Amendment to Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968 providing concessional licenses to SC/ST hotel owners is not arbitrary or unconstitutional.

The petitioner, B Govindraj Hegde, Secretary of the Federation of Wine Merchants Association, Karnataka, challenged the vires of the Karnataka Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order in Succession Case for Lack of Jurisdiction to Reopen Probate Proceedings. Letters of Administration cannot be revoked under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 without a properly instituted petition and notice to all parties.

The petitioner, Smt. Gajalakshmi, sought Letters of Administration in respect of the last will and testament of her paternal uncle, Radhakrishna Reddy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Fee Regulation in Unaided Schools — State Has Power to Regulate Fees Under Maharashtra Education Institutes (Prevention of Capitation Fees) Act, 1987 to Prevent Capitation Fees and Profiteering.

The petitioners, an association of private unaided minority and non-minority schools running international curriculum schools, challenged the constitu...