Search Results for "KIAD Act acquisition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "KIAD Act acquisition"

46 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Allotment Under KIAD Act, Upholding Allotment to Highest Bidder. Petitioner's Claim to Land as Successor to Mining Lease Rejected as Previous Court Orders Concluded Against It and Allotment Was Lawful Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

24 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by M/s Katwa Udyog Limited (KUL) challenging the allotment of land measuring 305 acres and 7 guntas at Na...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by GPA Holder in Land Acquisition Case — No Locus Standi to Challenge Acquisition Under KIAD Act. The Court held that a GPA holder cannot maintain a writ petition challenging land acquisition under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, as he has no independent right and the owner had already received compensation.

3 Dec 2025

The case involves a writ appeal filed by Jemcy Ponnappa C.P. and Casuba Infrastructure and Development Company against the State of Karnataka and othe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Gram Panchayat's Property Tax Levy on Industrial Units in KIADB Area — Property Tax Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Is Valid Despite KIADB Land Ownership.

1 Jul 2025

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various industrial units located in the Sompura Industrial Area, developed by the Karnataka I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

17 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Directs Shifting of Date for Determining Market Value Due to Inordinate Delay. Compensation to be Determined as on Date of Award Instead of Preliminary Notification Under Section 28 of KIAD Act, 1966.

2 Jan 2025

The appellants, Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and others, purchased residential sites in Gottigere Village, Bengaluru between 1995 and 1997. On 3rd April...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes KIADB Order Denying Lodging and Boarding in Industrial Area — Violation of Natural Justice. Allotment of industrial shed for fabrication unit does not preclude ancillary use like lodging and boarding for workers, and denial without hearing is arbitrary under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution.

9 Jul 2020

The petitioner, M/s Durga Fabrication Works, represented by its proprietor Sri Prakash Ramu Rathod, was allotted an industrial shed in Plot No.10D of ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Industrial Development — Petitioners Failed to Show Violation of Statutory Provisions. The Court held that the acquisition under the KIAD Act, 1966 was valid and the petitioners were not entitled to higher compensation as they had already received enhanced compensation under a consent award.

3 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Smt. Kempamma and others, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under KIAD Act — Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable. Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Under KIAD Act, 1966 Held Not Governed by the 2013 Act, and Notifications Do Not Lapse.

17 Aug 2017

The petitioners, landowners in Belagola village, Srirangapattana taluk, Mandya district, challenged the preliminary notification dated 15.09.2000 issu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenges by Landowners in KIADB Proceedings — Preliminary Notification Under Section 28(1) of KIAD Act Not Quashed Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Section 28(2) and Section 28(4). The court held that the petitioners were guilty of delay and laches and had no locus standi to challenge the acquisition after the final notification was issued.

12 Nov 2013

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Industrial Development Due to Non-Compliance with Section 28 of KIADB Act, 1966. Preliminary Notification Lapsed as Final Notification Not Issued Within Prescribed Period of Two Years.

26 Jun 2013

The petitioners, landowners from Gavenahalli Village, Hassan Taluk and District, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)