Search Results for "Juvenility"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Juvenility Claim Rejected Due to Insufficient Evidence; Allahabad High Court’s Inquiry Report Upheld. Writ petition dismissed as court finds age determination report and evidence confirm petitioner’s majority status at the time of offense.

The petitioner was convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He later claimed juvenility at the time of the crime...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Juvenile Benefit Claim After Final Conviction Under Section 7A of Juvenile Justice Act, 2000. Claim of Juvenility Can Be Raised at Any Stage Even After Final Disposal; Court Must Determine Age and Forward Juvenile to Board.

The petitioner, Sunil s/o Laxman Javade, was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code by judgment and order dated 08....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Declares Accused Juvenile and Quashes Death Sentence Under Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. Age Determination Based on School Birth Certificate Prevails Over Ossification Test, Leading to Release After Over 5 Years Incarceration as Maximum Sentence for Juvenile Below 16 is 3 Years.

The Supreme Court heard appeals challenging the judgment and order dated 15.11.2018 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which affirmed the death sentenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Age Determination in Murder Case. Court Upholds Sessions Judge's Finding That Appellant Was Above 18 Years Based on Birth Certificate Over School Certificate Under Rule 12 of Juvenile Justice Rules, 2007.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the Punjab & Haryana High Court's order dismissing as withdrawn the appellant's applications for addit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Appellants convicted under Sections 302 read with Section 34, 120B, and 364 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, with life imprisonment and concurrent sentences, as evidence formed a complete chain excluding innocence.

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal challenging the conviction and sentence of two appellants for offences under the Indian Penal Code,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Robbery Case, Upholds Conviction Under Section 394 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act — Belated Defenses of Juvenility and Insanity Rejected as Unsubstantiated.

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal of Mohd. Anwar, who was convicted under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Murder Case Based on Injured Eyewitness Testimony. Sole Testimony of Injured Eyewitness Sufficient for Conviction Under Section 304 Part II/34 IPC When Credible and Reliable.

The case pertains to an incident on 18th June, 1995, during a Jagjit Singh night program in Nainital, where the deceased Rajesh Sah intervened when so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Mass Violence Case — Five Murdered, House Set Ablaze During Village Rivalry. Evidence of Injured Eyewitnesses and Medical Reports Found Credible; No Ground to Interfere with Concurrent Findings of Trial Court and High Court.

The case arises from a gruesome incident of mass violence that occurred on 29 March 1983 in Village Jamalpur Kodai, District Muzaffarpur, Bihar. A lon...