Search Results for "Industrial Court revision"

738 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 738 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practice. Withdrawal of incentive bonus without lawful revision held to be unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through its General Manager of BEST, challenged the judgment and order dated 14 February 2008 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Workman in Absenteeism and Assault Case, Reduces Backwages to 25%. Industrial Court's reduction of backwages from 50% to 25% upheld as workman failed to prove he was not gainfully employed during dismissal period.

The petitioner, Sahebrao Khemaji Kale, a workman employed as a Painter and later Moulder with Paras Agro Engineering Work, was dismissed from service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Employer's Failure to Pay Full Wages and Notice Pay Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Retrenchment Invalid.

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) filed five writ petitions challenging separate awards of the Labour Court, Dhule,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Dismissing Complaint for Non-Implementation of Award. Delay of 4½ years in filing complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 held fatal as no sufficient cause shown.

The petitioner, Kashinath Parvati Labade, was a workman employed with the Department of Social Forestry, Maharashtra. He was allegedly illegally termi...