Search Results for "Income Tax Officers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Income Tax Officers"

897 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 897 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Income Tax Reopening Notices in Search-Based Assessment Cases Due to Mandatory Application of Section 153C. Assessing Officer Cannot Invoke General Reassessment Provisions Under Sections 147/148 When Material Originates from Search Under Section 132/132A, as Special Provisions Under Section 153C Override and Require Exclusive Procedural Compliance.

7 Jan 2026

The judgment concerned a group of petitions challenging notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, reopening assessments under Sect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Income Tax Appeal Filed by Assessee Company Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court’s Judgment Reserved on 12 June 2025 and Pronounced on 20 June 2025.

20 Jun 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) of Income Tax Act and Rule 3(7)(i) of Income Tax Rules in Bank Employee Loan Perquisite Case. Delegation of Power to Prescribe Fringe Benefits Held Not Excessive and Use of SBI Prime Lending Rate as Benchmark Upheld as Non-Arbitrary.

7 May 2024

The Supreme Court, in a common judgment, dismissed appeals filed by staff unions and officers' associations of various banks challenging the constitut...

Supreme Court

Compounding of Offences – Definition of First Offence – Discretion of Tax Authorities.

7 Feb 2025

Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 276CC – Compounding of Offences – Discretionary Relief – Interpretation of Guidelines – Supreme Court’s Rev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Processing of Income Tax Return and Refund Under Section 143(1) Despite Pending Scrutiny Under Section 143(2) — CBDT Instruction No.1 of 2015 Quashed. The court held that the Assessing Officer cannot withhold refund merely because a scrutiny notice has been issued, as the provisions of Section 143(1) and 143(1D) are mandatory and independent of Section 143(2).

15 Oct 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Group M. Media India Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the inaction of ...

High Court

KAHC010028192013_1

26 Sep 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by TPAs Challenging TDS Notices Under Section 194J of Income Tax Act. Payments to Hospitals by TPAs for Health Insurance Claims Are Not Subject to TDS as They Are Not Fees for Professional or Technical Services.

3 May 2010

The petitioners, Dedicated Health Care Services TPA (India) Pvt. Ltd. and others, are Third Party Administrators (TPAs) registered with the Insurance ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Withholding Tax on Firm Function Services Paid to Non-Resident US Company. Payments for Central Administrative Support Services Held Not Taxable as Fees for Included Services Under Indo-US Tax Treaty.

27 Apr 2010

The petitioner, McKinsey & Company, Inc. (United States), a non-resident company incorporated under US laws, is part of the McKinsey Group providing i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Part in TDS Dispute Regarding Payments to Doctors by Hospital. Payments to doctors with fixed plus variable pay under written contracts treated as salary subject to TDS under Section 192 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

22 Jan 2015

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Tax Recovery, Holds Notification Empowering Tahsildar as Tax Recovery Officer Cannot Have Retrospective Effect; Attachments Invalid. Executive Notification under Section 2(44) of Income-tax Act, 1961 Cannot Operate Retrospectively to Validate Pre-issuance Acts, as Delegated Legislation Lacks Retrospective Force Absent Express Statutory Authorization.

28 Jul 1969

The dispute arose out of recovery proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee, M.C. Ponnoose, had income-tax arrears, and his shares were...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)