Search Results for "Inadvertent error"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "Inadvertent error"

263 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 263 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Bona Fide Claim for Exemption Based on Professional Advice Does Not Amount to Concealment or Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars.

6 Apr 2026

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Sys...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c). Bonafide belief and full disclosure of transaction negate mens rea for concealment.

6 Apr 2026

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Sys...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of MEIS Benefits on Ground of Mis-declaration of Intent. Court holds that mere mis-declaration of intent without specific provision in Foreign Trade Policy cannot be a ground to deny export incentives under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme.

2 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Portescap India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejection of its...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Indefinite Blacklisting Order for Misbranded Veterinary Medicine — Show Cause Notice Lacked Specific Warning of Blacklisting and Appellant Was Not the Direct Supplier. The Court held that an indefinite blacklisting order without proper notice and without the appellant being a direct supplier is void ab initio and cannot be sustained.

11 Dec 2020

The appellant, Vetindia Pharmaceuticals Limited, a licensed drug manufacturer, was blacklisted indefinitely by the State of Uttar Pradesh on 08.09.200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disciplinary Action Against Customs Appraiser for Negligence in Duty — Reduction in Pay Sustained. Petitioner failed to exercise due diligence in verifying import consignment, leading to revenue loss, and the penalty of reduction in pay by three stages for one year was proportionate to the misconduct.

20 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Satyendra Singh Gurjar, was a Customs Appraiser recruited through the Civil Services Examination, 1996. On 5 December 2006, while post...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Corrects Inadvertent Error in Judgment, Substitutes 'Management' with 'Banking Operations' in Hamdard Trust Dispute. The Court clarified that the resolution dated April 28, 2015 pertained only to banking operations, not management, and dismissed contempt petitions.

9 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court of India dealt with Miscellaneous Applications and Contempt Petitions arising from a dispute concerning the management and banking o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Plaint to Correct Mistake in Description of Plaintiff in Recovery Suit. Inadvertent Error in Naming Individual Instead of Company Held Curable Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC.

1 Mar 2019

The appellant, Varun Pahwa, as Director of Siddharth Garments Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 25,00,000/- advanced as loan to the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Notices Against Defendant in Patent Infringement Suit — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court holds that breach of an order must be willful and deliberate to constitute contempt under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, and mere technical or inadvertent violations do not attract punishment.

28 Jun 2016

The Plaintiff, CTR Manufacturing Industries Ltd., filed a patent infringement suit against Sergi Transformer Explosion Prevention Technologies Pvt. Lt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Inquiry Officer's Penalty Order for Lack of Jurisdiction in Misdescription of Cargo Case. Container Corporation of India's Inquiry Officer acted without authority under the Indian Railways Act, 1989 and the Railways (Punitive Charges for Misdescription of Goods) Rules, 2004.

20 Feb 2015

The case involves two writ petitions arising from an order dated 10.09.2012 passed by an Inquiry Officer, Shri Srinivas Mudgerikar, appointed by the H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Arrest of Judgment Debtor in Execution of Foreign Decree — Conversion Rate for Decretal Amount Must Be Determined Before Arrest. The court held that before ordering arrest under Order 21 Rule 37 CPC, the exact amount payable in Indian rupees must be ascertained when the decree is in foreign currency.

13 Aug 2013

The Bombay High Court dealt with three chamber summons arising out of execution proceedings of a foreign decree. The original suit was filed in Englan...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)