Search Results for "Imports and Exports Control Act, 1947"

50 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 50 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Confiscation of Almond Seeds Imported Without Valid Licence. Import of almond seeds under REP licence for 'seeds' held invalid as almonds are not seeds for import purposes under Customs Act.

The petitioner, M/s. M.B. Impex, a sole proprietorship concern, imported a consignment of almond seeds (Non Pareil variety) from California, USA in Fe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2012

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Customs Act Case — Evidence of Possession of Contraband Gold Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 135(1)(a)(i) and 135(1)(b)(i) of Customs Act, 1962 and Section 5 of Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947.

The applicant, Eliyad Abdulla Bholim, was tried for offences punishable under Sections 135(1)(a)(i) and 135(1)(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 and Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to COFEPOSA Preventive Detention Powers for Foreign Exchange Violations. Petitioners Contend Absence of Penal Provisions Under FEMA Renders Section 3(1) Unconstitutional.

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed directly in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Regulations Requiring Additional Examination for Customs House Agents Licenses. No Vested Right to License Arises from Passing Examination Under Repealed Regulations.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the Bombay Custom House Agents Association and two individual members challenging the constit...