Search Results for "IPC 397"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "IPC 397"

495 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 495 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes FIR and Revisional Order for Violation of Accused's Right to Hearing in Criminal Revision. The court held that Section 401(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 mandates hearing for accused or other persons in revisional proceedings, and Sessions Judge's failure to hear petitioners before allowing revision against dismissal of Section 156(3) application rendered the order and subsequent FIR invalid.

2 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from a criminal writ petition filed by two petitioners, a senior citizen and her daughter, seeking to quash an FIR registered agains...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes FIR and Sessions Court Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Accused Not Heard in Revision Against Rejection of Section 156(3) CrPC Application. The court held that the accused must be heard before the Revisional Court when a revision is filed against the rejection of a Section 156(3) CrPC application, as failure to do so violates principles of natural justice.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioners, Smt. Shaila Damodar Sinai Borkar and Dr. Priti Siddsh Kharangate, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the High Court of Bombay at G...

Supreme Court

Quashing of FIR Set Aside — Supreme Court Reiterates Limits of Section 482 CrPC in Property Fraud Cases.

8 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court set aside the Madras High Court’s order quashing criminal proceedings arising from alleged fraudulent settlement deeds in a fa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals in Kidnapping and Attempted Murder Case by Setting Aside Conviction Under Section 364A IPC. Conviction for Attempt to Murder and Robbery Upheld as Prosecution Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt the Strangulation, Burning, and Looting of Victim, But Failed to Establish Ransom Demand Essential for Section 364A Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3 Jan 2024

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dated 26.06.2018, which dismissed the criminal appeals of the a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Magistrate's Summoning Order in Hawala Case — High Court's Revision Order Set Aside. Court holds that at the stage of taking cognizance under Section 190(1)(b) CrPC, the Magistrate need not record detailed reasons; sufficiency of grounds is to be assessed from the charge sheet and accompanying documents.

8 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Gujarat against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had set aside the order of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Dacoity Based on Injured Eyewitness Testimony. Testimony of Injured Witness Held Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 395, 396, 302, 397 IPC.

1 Mar 2013

The appellant, Ajaykumar Sunilkumar Sharma, was convicted by the 11th Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Dewree, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.690 of 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction in Robbery Case: Section 397 IPC Not Attracted as No Individual Use of Deadly Weapon Proved. Appellant's Conviction Under Section 392 IPC Sustained but Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone.

14 Oct 2011

The appeal was filed by original accused Nos. 1 and 2 against their conviction under Section 392 read with Section 397 read with Section 34 of the Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Dacoity to Robbery with Hurt in Appeal Against Sessions Court Judgment. Appellant Convicted Under Section 394 IPC Instead of Sections 395 and 397 IPC as Prosecution Failed to Prove Presence of Five Persons for Dacoity.

29 Aug 2006

The appellant, Balu Pandharinath Takle, was one of four accused charged with dacoity under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for al...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Dacoity Case Based on Recovery of Stolen Property and Identification. The court dismissed revision petitions challenging conviction under Sections 397, 342 r/w 149 IPC for dacoity, robbery, and wrongful confinement, relying on recovery of stolen property from accused in another state.

28 Jun 2006

The judgment concerns two criminal revision applications filed by accused no.2 Zulfikar Ali and accused no.4 Mehmood Shaikh against their conviction a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in MCOCA Case Due to Lack of Satisfactory Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under MCOCA and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove unlawful assembly and common object beyond reasonable doubt.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal appeals arising from a single incident where a group of individuals allegedly formed an unlawful assembly a...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)