Search Results for "IPC 366A"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of in Child Trafficking Case Under IPC and ITPA -- Minor Victim's Testimony Deemed Credible Despite Minor Contradictions

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by the appellant, K.P. Kirankumar @ Kiran, against his conviction in a child trafficking and com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Additional Charge Under POCSO Act in Kidnapping Case — No Sexual Intent Established. Court holds that mere kidnapping without evidence of sexual assault does not attract Section 7 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The petitioner, accused No.1 in S.C.No.227/2018 pending before the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar, challenged the order dated 31.12....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Victim's Testimony Found Unreliable and Contradictory, Leading to Confirmation of Acquittal Under Sections 366A, 365, 376, 114 r/w 34 IPC.

The case arises from an incident where the complainant, Hanmanth, alleged that his minor daughter was kidnapped and raped by the accused, Mallikarjun ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Rape and Murder Case — Review Petition Allowed in Open Court. Court Holds That Life Imprisonment Is the Rule and Death Sentence an Exception, and Mitigating Circumstances Must Be Considered Even in Heinous Crimes.

The Supreme Court of India heard a review petition filed by Md. Mannan @ Abdul Mannan, who had been convicted for the rape and murder of an eight-year...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping of Minor Girl. Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 5(1) and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 366A, 376 of IPC.

The appellant, Rupesh Parasram Nehare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Warora in Special (POCSO) Case No. 05 of 2015 for offences under Section 5(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Trafficking Minor for Prostitution under IPC and PITA. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Panch Witnesses.

The appellant, Smt. Bindo Ganesh Patil, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 381 of 2015 for offences under Sections 366A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Age. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 and Consent Was Voluntary.

The appellant, Parvesh Bagde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Sections 376(2)(f) and 366A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Santosh Thorat, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual ...