Search Results for "IPC 342"

208 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 208 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Taking or Enticing Minor. Prosecution Fails to Prove Essential Ingredients of Section 363 IPC as Minor Victim's Testimony Does Not Establish That She Was Taken Away by Accused.

The appellants, Sau. Banu Ramchandra Borgaonkar and Sandip Kedar Pande, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Corroboration and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Shrikant Sukhdeo Borkar, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Sections 376, 323, and 342 IPC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction in Robbery Case: Offence of Robbery Under Section 390 IPC Not Made Out as No Grievous Hurt Caused or Attempted. The court held that for theft to become robbery, the offender must cause or attempt to cause death or grievous hurt, and mere tying up does not suffice.

The appellant, Dudhnath @ Ajay Baburam Harijan, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Bombay, for offences under Sections 394, 450...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder in Family Feud Case. Court acquits three other accused due to lack of evidence, finding that the prosecution failed to prove their involvement beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two cross appeals arising from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, dated October 9, 1987, in Sessions Case No.84 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Laxman alias Laxmayya Gangaram Zinna, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai for the offence punishable under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision and Appeals in Forest Officer Assault Case — Acquittal Upheld Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Allegations of Assault and Wrongful Confinement by Forest Officers Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 323, 342, 504 IPC.

The case involves a criminal revision petition and two criminal appeals arising from an incident where the complainant, a forest officer, alleged that...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363 and 376 of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Sri Subramani, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar on 02.11.2018 in S.C.No.21/2017 for offences punis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction Under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom and Relied on Uncorroborated Extra-Judicial Confessions and Unreliable Dying Declaration.

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of one Suresh Kumar, a financier, on 19.08.2015. The deceased was last seen on that day and his dead bo...