Search Results for "IMEI"

46 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Senior Police Inspector in Mansukh Hiran Murder Case - No Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy Under UAP Act. Court held that mere meetings and use of benami SIM card without corroboration do not establish criminal conspiracy under Sections 16, 18, 20 of UAP Act, 1967.

The appellant, Sunil Dharma Mane, a Senior Inspector of Police, was arrested on 23 April 2021 in connection with the murder of Mansukh Hiran and relat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Failure to Inform Right to Search Before Magistrate Leads to Acquittal. The court held that non-compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act, 1985, vitiates the trial and entitles the accused to acquittal.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed by individuals convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Improper Investigation. Conviction under SC/ST Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove caste-based insult and arson beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Aba @ Munjaba s/o Rajabhau Giri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Ambajogai, in Special Case No. 3 of 2013 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Shrinivas @ Shenu Shirsappa Ayyappa Swami and Vyankatesh @ Vyankati Narsimallu Sagar, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Filed by Accused Convicted for Murder and Robbery; Outcome Not Ascertainable from Extract. Appeal Challenged Life Sentence Imposed Under Sections 302 and 394 Read with Section 34 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence Involving Mobile Phone Tracking and Recoveries.

The present criminal appeal was filed by Accused No.3, Gopinath Vitthal Sable, challenging his conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302, 397 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard two criminal appeals filed by accused Nos. 3 and 2 (Mahammad Shariff and Hrushikesh @ Shastri) challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction Under POCSO Act and IPC. Trial Court Conviction for Kidnapping, Rape, Murder and Destroying Evidence Under IPC and POCSO Act Upheld by High Court.

The Supreme Court heard criminal appeals by special leave preferred by two appellants against the common judgment of the High Court of Uttarakhand, wh...