Search Results for "Hotel owner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Hotel owner"

678 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 678 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Civil Appeal in Deemed Tenancy Dispute Under Bombay Rent Act. The court upheld the appellate bench's finding that the agreement dated 16.08.1967 was for conducting hotel business, not a leave and license arrangement, thus not attracting Section 15A of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 for deemed tenancy status.

8 Apr 2025

The Civil Appeal originated from an order dated 16.07.2018 in Civil Revision Application No. 247 of 2016 by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, wh...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'HOTEL SPECIAL' vs 'SVT HOTEL SPECIAL' for Asafoetida. Deceptive Similarity Established Despite Addition of Prefix 'SVT'.

5 Apr 2024

The appellant/defendant, S.V.T Products, challenged an interim injunction order passed by the XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S. No...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302/34 IPC and Section 120B IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Conspiracy and Involvement of Accused Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

31 Jan 2020

The case pertains to the murder of two individuals, Raja Mohammed (D1) and Raj Mohammed (D2), on the night of 28 December 1990 near Sarayananthal, Pap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

11 Aug 2017

The case involves two appeals against conviction for murder, robbery, and causing disappearance of evidence. The deceased, Madan Phatak, went missing ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition Notices for Hotels/Restaurants in Thane — Municipal Corporation's Action Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Hearing Under Section 478 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

20 Dec 2014

The judgment involves a group of ten writ petitions filed by owners/occupiers of hotels, bars, and restaurants in Thane city, challenging demolition n...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Bona Fide Need for Hotel Business Established. Landlord's son's need for premises to start hotel business held genuine and reasonable under Section 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

22 Feb 2013

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the applicants (original defendants) for possession of suit p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction for murder of wife based on circumstantial evidence set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

10 Dec 2012

The appellant, Santosh Haridas Bhandwalkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the murder of his wife, Dhanashree, under Sect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Rape and Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 376 IPC.

7 May 2010

The case pertains to the alleged rape and murder of Sonali Vasant Deshpande by the accused Rohan Pushpraj Fanasgaonkar on 27 July 2004 at a hotel in L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Padma Vilas Palace Held to Be a Building Used as a Hotel. The Court ruled that the structure was a hotel building under Section 2(11) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and thus the assessee was not entitled to set off under Section 50(2) for reinvestment in office premises.

31 Mar 2010

The appeal by the Revenue challenged the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order dated 6th March 2009, which held that Padma Vilas Palace was not a buil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Payment of Stamp Duty on Agreement. Court holds that stamp duty is a fiscal matter and not a bar to appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Lloyds Realty Developers Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)