Search Results for "Hindu widow"

234 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. The appellant failed to prove title and possession, and no substantial question of law was raised.

The case involves a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated 10.11.2006 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Right of Pre-Adoption Sons to Inherit from Adopted Father in Hindu Succession Case. Sons born before adoption remain heirs of their natural father and are entitled to inherit his estate under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The present appeals arose from a dispute over the inheritance of property left by Laxman, who was given in adoption to Saraswati on 2 November 1935. A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Family Pension Dispute — Second Wife Entitled to Family Pension Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 Despite Bigamous Marriage. Family Pension Cannot Be Bequeathed by Will as It Does Not Form Part of Deceased's Estate.

The case involves a dispute over family pension following the death of Mahaling Ramchandra Patil, a primary teacher who died on 5 May 2001. He had mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Family Pension Dispute — Second Wife Entitled to Family Pension Despite Bigamous Marriage. Family Pension Cannot Be Bequeathed by Will as It Is a Statutory Right Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The case involves a dispute over family pension following the death of Mahaling Ramchandra Patil, a primary teacher who died on 5 May 2001. He had mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings. Court holds that second wife and her children are entitled to share in joint family property as coparceners under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the first wife and her daughters against the husband and his second wife and children. The trial court and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute Over Sale Deed Validity — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court Held That No Substantial Question of Law Arises When Findings Are Based on Appreciation of Evidence and Are Not Perverse.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute. The appellants, Rambhau Maroti Fating and others, and M/s L.G. Developers & Buil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Restores Trial Court's Decree of Declaration of Ownership and Injunction. First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Improper Appreciation of Evidence Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court, which re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's title as sole heir was established and the defendant failed to prove adverse possession.

The second appeal arose from a suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner unless there is clear ouster and hostile title asserted.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gurudayalsing Bindra (original defendant, now represented by his legal representatives as a...