Search Results for "Hindalco Industries Ltd."

34 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Decides Revenue Appeal Against Tribunal's Order on Excise Valuation of Fiat Cars. Assessee's Price Below Cost Held as Normal Price Under Section 4(1)(a) by Tribunal, Revenue Challenges on Ground That Price Did Not Reflect Manufacturing Cost and Profit.

The dispute concerned the valuation of Fiat Uno model cars for central excise duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The assessee, M/s ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Driver with 50% Backwages in Industrial Dispute Against Hotel. Principal Employer Liability Affirmed Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for Termination by Contractor.

The judgment concerns cross petitions filed by M/s. Chalet Hotels Ltd. (the employer) and Mr. Bhikan Laxman Deokar (the workman) challenging an Award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition Against Rejection of Section 264 Application for FBT Refund. Intimation under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is an assessment order for the purpose of revision under Section 264.

The petitioner, Hindalco Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 6 March 2019 passed by the Principal Chief Commissioner ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Construction on Municipal Land. The court held that the petitioner had no legal right to the land and the demolition order was valid under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The petitioner, Manish Estates Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the demolition order dated 6th October 2010 passed by the Deputy Chief Eng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Hindalco Industries Tax Case on Section 80HHC Deduction and Capital vs Revenue Expenditure. Tribunal's findings on exclusion of local turnover for export deduction and treatment of financial advisory fees as revenue expenditure upheld.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-6 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 28.11.2008 in ITA No.3668...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Valuation Case — Issue Already Adjudicated by CESTAT. Principle of Res Judicata Applied to Successive Show Cause Notices for Enhancing Invoice Value Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, M/s. Royal Oil Field Private Limited, entered into a contract on February 25, 2002 with M/s. IMX Port National Trading Corporation, Ca...