Search Results for "Grampanchayat"

224 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 224 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12%. Court holds that arbitrator's findings on breach and damages are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Agarsons Container Terminals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stay on Grampanchayat Elections Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Additional Collector's Order Staying Sarpanch/Up-Sarpanch Elections Set Aside as Unauthorized Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Parmeshwar Kachru Satpute and Dadasaheb Baburao Khindkar, were members of the Group Grampanchayat of Babhalwadi, Bedkuchiwadi, and Be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Grampanchayat Encroachment Case Due to Lack of Prosecution and Insufficient Evidence. Complaint under Maharashtra Gram Panchayat Act fails as appellant did not appear and evidence did not establish encroachment or public nuisance.

The appellant, Kalidas Jamadar Sable, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Shivthar, District Satara. He filed a complaint against respondent No.1, Mugut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Parity for Grampanchayat Employees with State Government Employees. Grampanchayat Employees Not Entitled to Same Benefits as State Government Employees Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioners, Maharashtra Rajya Grampanchayat Karmachari Mahasangh, a registered union of Grampanchayat employees, filed a writ petition seeking di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Court Holds That Removal of Sarpanch by No Confidence Motion Does Not Require Prior Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Under Section 55(2A) of the Act.

The petitioner, Bharat Vitthal Shete, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Pimpalgaon Khand. A no confidence motion was moved against him by respondent N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Invalid Votes by Resigned Members. Resignation of Grampanchayat Members Takes Effect Immediately Under Section 35(3A) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, Rendering Their Participation in No-Confidence Motion Void.

The petitioner, Manjulabai Govind Dhumal, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kantekur, Taluka Omerga, District Osmanabad. The Grampanchayat consisted o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Gram Panchayat's Petition Against Temple's Installation of CCTV Cameras. Right to Privacy and Security of Temple Upheld Over Panchayat's Claim of Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Gram Panchayat of Shani Shingnapur, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the respondent temple (Shri Shaneshwar Devasthan...