Search Results for "Goonda"

44 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of Over One Month Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid.

The petitioner, Rani, mother of the detenu Sidharaj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Snapping of Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Without Explanation Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Surya, brother of the detenu Karthick, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Unexplained delay of 54 days between arrest and detention order renders detention invalid under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, sister of the detenu Manikandan @ Pambu Mani, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Unexplained Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Kalavathi, sister of the detenu Iyyappan, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority — No Further Adjudication Required. The court held that when the detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 is revoked, the petition becomes infructuous.

The petitioner, Chithra, mother of the detenu Rohith, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Delay of Over Two Months Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid.

The petitioner, Aburojakani, mother of the detenu Mohammed Yusuf, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority. The court held that no adjudication is required when the detention order has been revoked, and the petition becomes infructuous.

The petitioner, Snegakumari, wife of the detenu Manikandan @ Koolamani, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...