Search Results for "Futures and Options"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Futures and Options"

42 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Legality of Arrests by Enforcement Directorate in Money Laundering Case After Predicate Offence Closed. Petitioners Allege Violation of Section 19 of PMLA and Fundamental Rights, Challenging Custody Remand Orders.

16 Jun 2026

The three writ petitions, heard together, challenged the legality of the arrest and subsequent custody remand orders of the petitioners, who were dire...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material — Reopening Based on Same Material as Original Assessment is Invalid. Change of opinion cannot justify reassessment when the Assessing Officer had already examined the same information during scrutiny under section 143(3).

27 Jun 2023

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Prabhat Properties Private Limited challenging notices under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute for Patent Illegality and Perversity. The court found that the arbitrator's interpretation of a condition subsequent in a share purchase agreement was patently illegal and perverse, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Mar 2019

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award arising from a share purchase agree...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Winding Up Petition Based on Alleged Debt Arising Out of F&O Trades; Respondent Disputes Liability and Raises Counter-Claim for Damages

28 Jun 2016

This company petition sought winding up of Prime Broking Company (India) Ltd under the Companies Act, 1956 on the ground of inability to pay debts. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matters — Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Setting Aside Award and Remanding for Reconsideration Without Finding Award to Be Void or Inoperative. The Court Held That Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Confer Power of Remand; Only Remedies Are to Uphold, Modify, or Set Aside the Award.

25 Jun 2013

The appellant, Geojit Financial Services Limited (now Geojit BNP Paribas Financial Services Limited), a stock broker registered with the National Stoc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broking Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Contrary to Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality.

10 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Bombay Construction and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award is Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's concurrent findings rejecting both claim and counterclaim for lack of evidence.

18 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Ventura Securities Ltd., a member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSEIL) and Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (BSEL), was a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitrator's findings that the respondent was entitled to recover the amount due from the petitioner for squared-off positions, rejecting the petitioner's counterclaim.

17 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Kritika Nagpal, appointed the respondent, Geojit Financial Services Ltd., to effect transactions on the Futures & Options Segment of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of the contract and byelaws was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not warrant interference.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar Bothra, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Established. Court upholds award holding petitioner liable for unauthorized trades and failure to prove respondent's instructions.

4 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Sytematix Shares & Stocks (India) Ltd., a stockbroker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)