Search Results for "Fee Refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Fee Refund"

381 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 381 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

High Court

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

14 Nov 2024

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

High Court

High Court Orders Tax Authority to Refund Rs. 10.69 Crores to Petitioner. Court rules in favor of the Petitioner, mandates refund with interest due to improper adjustment of dues.

9 Jul 2024

The case of a tax refund dispute, the Petitioner sought the refund of Rs. 10,69,89,606/- for the year 2011-2012. The Respondents had adjusted this ref...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes IBBI Circular as Ultra Vires in Insolvency Professional Regulation — Circular Purporting to Clarify Regulation 4(2)(b) of LP Regulations Held to Be an Impermissible Retrospective Amendment.

4 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Amit Gupta, a chartered accountant and registered insolvency professional, challenged a circular dated 28 September 2023 issued by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition Challenging Joint Application Requirement for Refund of Court Fees in DRT — Rule 5 of Refund Rules Struck Down as Ultra Vires. The requirement of a joint application by the applicant and defendant for refund of court fees was held arbitrary and beyond the rule-making power under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

9 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Yes Bank Limited, a bank governed by the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, had advanced a loan to a borrower who defaulted. The bank filed...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Water Tax Levy Under UP Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Reverses Refund Order. Water and Sewerage Tax Imposed on Premises is Valid as Tax on Lands and Buildings Under Entry 49 of List II, Not a Fee, Under Section 52(1)(a) of the Act.

22 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, challenging the levy of water ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Form-3 Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for Assessment Year 2003-2004 — Designated Authority Directed to Recompute Amount Payable After Considering Refund Already Paid. The Court held that the Designated Authority must consider refunds paid under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 while computing the amount payable under the DTVSV Act, and apply the principle of set off under Section 245 of the IT Act.

25 Aug 2021

The Petitioner, Cooperative Rabobank U.A., a bank established in the Netherlands and part of the Rabobank Group, is a regular assessee under the Incom...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Against Trial Court's Order on Court Fee in Partition Suit — Section 35(1) of Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. The court held that the trial court must first determine the market value of the suit properties before directing the plaintiff to pay proper court fee.

24 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Anjanappa, filed a suit for partition (O.S.No.808/2008) before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, seeking 1/3rd share i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Full Refund for Flights Cancelled During COVID-19 Lockdown — Office Memorandum Discriminating Between Pre-Lockdown and Lockdown Bookings Held Invalid. Airlines Must Refund Full Fare Without Cancellation Charges for All Cancelled Flights, and Credit Shell Cannot Be Imposed Unilaterally.

1 Oct 2020

The judgment arises from a batch of writ petitions filed in the Supreme Court of India challenging the refusal of airlines to refund the full amount f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Locus of Parents in Fee Regulation. Individual parents held to have standing under Maharashtra Educational Institutes (Regulation of Fees) Act to approach Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee.

18 Jul 2017

The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions challenging the locus of individual parents to approach the Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee (DFRC) ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)